Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The difference between the Nic and DOH is that the Nic actually "places" or manipulates pilots wherever Nicolau decided was best. It is an artificial assemblage utilizing ambiguous and irrelevant factors such as expectations and financial snapshots, while ignoring the value of time on the job. Totally backwards.
DOH is self explanatory, fair and equitable. It doesn't place pilots like the Nic - out of their natural order. The 80% that would go below Colello is a misleading statement. They were already there - by virtue of when they arrived compared to when he arrived.
I finally understand the east confusion about this seniority issue. You guys think that you are still in control.
They were already there - by virtue of when they arrived compared to when he arrived.
That the west is showing up and asking to join your little flying club and that we hoping to be ADDED to YOUR list. Incorrect. The airline headquarters is in the west. The airline CEO and president are west guys. The east pilots are being added to our list.
So when Colello “arrives†he shows up as a furloughed F/O. He was placed on the combined list as a furloughed F/O. Our senior captains that were flying as senior captains continue to be senior captains under the Nicolau.
You want us to show up and be place on your list according to how long you have been standing in a line that has disappeared.
That 80% number is not misleading. That is a hard and fast number. USAPA wants Dean Colello is placed senior to every west F/O and a majority of all the west captains.
Simple but true - those Westies don't deserve the seniority they accrued at HP because Easties didn't accrue seniority as quickly. That is the East position in a nutshell...It's about when you got here on the collective property. Placing someone hired in the mid 80's behind someone hired in 2005 is simply a non-starter.
Simple but true - those Westies don't deserve the seniority they accrued at HP because Easties didn't accrue seniority as quickly. That is the East position in a nutshell...
Jim
You are discounting the time value of work.
Seniority in PHX is protected.
Just how much "time value of work" does a furloughed pilot have? And what does that have to do with seniority. It's just another way of saying that the Westies don't deserve the seniority they accrued at HP prior to the merger since Easties didn't enjoy the same benefit.
More like trapped, according to the C&R's that USAPA has proposed. Isn't the purpose of the exercise to combine seniority into a single list?
Jim
It's only airline pilots that can't seem to learn from other union's better examples.
The pilots are the only group arrogant enough to think that they can come up with a better system than DOH. All the others have embraced it, and their mergers worked fine. Pilot mergers are notoriously nasty, because they introduce all kinds of unquantifiable variables into what should be a simple, easy to understand formula.Possibly because airline pilots have much more to gain or lose from the method of integration - "better" is usually in the eye of the beholder and depends on which method will gain the beholder the most or lose them the least. Still amounts to "How dare those Westies get seniority so fast." They don't deserve that "time value of work" because you didn't get the same value for the time you worked.
Jim
It is and it even has a name - seniority. Sometimes that credit (just another word for "time value for work") is negative (a pilot with X years of longevity can't even hold the job he had as a new hire), sometimes it's neutral (a pilot with Y years of service can only hold the same job as he held as a new hire) and sometimes it's very positive (a pilot with Y years longevity can hold a lot better job than was possible as a new hire).The bottom line is, credit should be given for the amount of service given to the organization.
It is and it even has a name - seniority. Sometimes that credit (just another word for "time value for work") is negative (a pilot with X years of longevity can't even hold the job he had as a new hire), sometimes it's neutral (a pilot with Y years of service can only hold the same job as he held as a new hire) and sometimes it's very positive (a pilot with Y years longevity can hold a lot better job than was possible as a new hire).
For proof, just look at the percentage of former furloughed East pilots that returned. Some of those discovered that they had more "credit" for less years at a different employer than they would have at US with more years.
It still boils down to the same thing - East is entitled to more credit for years worked because West got more credit for their years worked.
Jim
....
...you are accumulating jobs that rightfully belong to the west, ...
TWA/Ozark set the standard in the early 1980s for ugly mergers.
UAL is beginning to reevaluate their previous philosophy regarding merger policy and seniority as we speak.
Excellent information. I thought the TWA/Ozark thing was uglier than it was. I also didn't realize it was DOH. I didn't see what the C&R were, so maybe they were the issue. I was new to the aviation thing then, so apparently I didn't remember it quite the way it was. I admit, I'm not perfect.