So tell me, oldiebutgoodie, does the company have to accept the negotiated contract (including Section 22) before it can be enforceable or not?
Jim
PS - then, of course, there's that pesky transition agreement language....
Management has already said that they will accept whatever the pilots decide on this issue, with a few qualifications. USAPA's list meets them. Therefore, even though they have gone back on their word before, I still expect them to honor it in this regard. Especially since they have nothing to lose by doing so, and a lot to lose if they don't.
As far as the furloughs go, the TAs were written with a few generalities. One is that ALPA was representing the pilots. Once ALPA was voted out, you can essentially change the word "ALPA" for "USAPA" throughout the document (or, if you prefer, just change the wording to "the association"). Therefore, the correct verbage is that the seniority will be merged using "USAPA" merger policy, which we all know is "date of hire" (with fences and restrictions). The crap about correcting the lists from 20 years ago because of ALPA's stupidity is a smoke screen, at best. Blame ALPA for screwing up your career, not USAPA.
Next, the issue of out of seniority furloughs. The furlough policy assumes that the group has been integrated. Since they haven't been, then as the company reduces flying at each division, it has to cut the pilots proportionately. They have stated this over and over, but a few apparently "learning challenged" people still don't get it. Reminds me of the guy in the PHX crew room video that had to have the 6 east guys' situation (the guys that returned east rather than be furloughed) explained no less than 5 times, and still didn't seem to get it.
There will be no contract while the pilots are fighting among themselves. Not gonna happen. There's just no reason for management to do it. I hope I'm wrong, but it just seems way too convenient for the company to drag this out for a long time.