Megasnoop
Veteran
Indignant is the proper word, and I'm not alone. The rest of the airline industry sees the antics of USAPA for what they are. Likewise, that same opinion transmutes to the indiviudal East pilots who perpetrated this debacle with their vote.
Nothing substantive, so your back to insults? You dont get your fantasy remedy and now all the industry is our enemy? I'm sure we'll cry all the way to the next contract, if there is one, or LOA84 rates, whichever comes first. We'll try our best, but as A320driver said,
They want CUTS not RAISES. They have all but backed out on their offer of parity + 3%.
Pay attention, Aquaman, Driver's got it right. There's no 50 grand payraise out there any time soon.
Good, because there's two options for the East at this point: LOA 93 ad infinitim or 50 grand a year in payraises for captains and 35 grand a year for F/Os, 15% into the 401k plus a return to major airline work rules, but with the Nic. You're welcome to choose your poison as you wish. That's the beauty of a democracy.
Or we can wait until the company implements the Hemenway Letter and YOU get optioned to LOA93. No worries, USAPA will file a grievance. THEN we all get that 3% raise. BTW, 15% 401k may be industry average, but its not in any proposal from company on the table now. On the bright side, after we go on LOA84 rates, with Hemenway in place, maybe you get a big raise.
Careful, you're getting closer to reality. . .
Well, there's a pretty intricate administrative organization called the NMB that has the tools to push the two sides through a collective bargaining process. I doubt the East will be able to hold up another seniority integration just because they don't like accepting a federal arbitration and when they are under court order to negotiate in good faith for a joint contract that includes Nicolau. Good luck trying to get any help from any agency, court or arbitrator.
Aquaman, your knowledge how the NMB works is lacking. NMB cant force arbitration on either party, unless you think Congress is going to re-write the RLA. Both sides have to mutually agree to wage arbitration. Refusing would not be in violation of Wakes order, even if it holds. Besides, you really think the company would agree to arbitration?