Dissent Equals Patriotism
Member
- Oct 24, 2007
- 64
- 0
The company has made a brazen attempt to divide East and West with their offer.
What they are doing to us is monstrous.
And they created a monster.
Agent "V"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The company has made a brazen attempt to divide East and West with their offer.
Just skimming through the Unions proposals...Can someone explain to me why our union is proposing farming out stations in 2011 Should'nt they be saying NO to farming out??? And under sick days the union is proposing half pay for the first 3 days and then full pay after that How about FULL PAY for all sick days...and only ONE more Holiday Who the hell is on the employees side???? It aint the company and from what I see its definitely not these bozos negotiating this scrap sheet
[/quote
I didn't see anything about profit sharing--unless I missed it.......I'm in for the $10 too---just let me know where to send it.
The company will never agree to section 6. Your west negotiators understand this and the best solution is transition talks. Anyone who tells you that the company would consider section 6 is far removed from reality. This industry is changing rapidly and there isn't enough time to change course in negotiations.
If you people want to follow internet posters who wear leather then see you in the office depot application line.
Things are a real mess with Canale. He has never stopped agreeing with Hemenway that those 19 stations must include farming out language. With a company making 1/2 billion a year the last two years, together with iron clad 'no contracting out language', why would Canale give that up? Because he's management.Just skimming through the Unions proposals...Can someone explain to me why our union is proposing farming out stations in 2011 Should'nt they be saying NO to farming out??? And under sick days the union is proposing half pay for the first 3 days and then full pay after that How about FULL PAY for all sick days...and only ONE more Holiday Who the hell is on the employees side???? It aint the company and from what I see its definitely not these bozos negotiating this scrap sheet
What is so comical about lining up legal help to fight for something that is inherently wrong? I think most people understand this. I really don't know why you have to be so disrespectful of me trying to help the west out. Tell me if I've done something wrong, I'll look at it and apologize if I have to. Do you have a better suggestion trying to keep Canale and PF accountable? As aside, we may also find out the fullness of the IAM/TWU agreement in the process. Something appears dirty.Nice post Tony, but be mindful that the man you speak of is starting another grass roots campaign. This time it is a comedic attempt $10 at a time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oman, I think most will respectfully disagree with you that the east and CLT has no problem giving the company a transition that just merges the west into the east contract. Believe it or not, most stations on the west don't want that either as it means 1,200 job loss. I think the vast majority of easties are 'screw transition' unless we get $20hr, and other benefits that are not part of our bankruptcy contract, otherwise wait till 2009.district force,
"But him and some east leaders in PHL and CLT don't understand that the best solution is to merge the west into the east. Unfortunately there is now division on the negotiations team that will not allow Randy Canale to merge the two groups."
YOU couldn't be more WRONG in that statement. first the east has and I REPEAT has NO PROBLEM bringing the west up to our contract
however this is a transition agreement not traditional neg. so WE on the east are NOT and I REPEAT are NOT going to give up more in our
B/S contract just to do that.. IF they the company wants to bring them up fine .. DO IT ALREADY but DON'T OPEN OUR CONTRACT UP
with extensions and lose profit sharing lose change of control because it's not GOING TO HAPPEN.
Now as far as a division on the negotiations team . once again your are dead WRONG.. just because we now have people negotiating
for US the membership and not to KISS the pinky doesn't bring division. maybe the rest of the 100,000.00 club should consider representing the people that pay THERE SALARY..
What is so comical about lining up legal help to fight for something that is inherently wrong? I think most people understand this. I really don't know why you have to be so disrespectful of me trying to help the west out. Tell me if I've done something wrong, I'll look at it and apologize if I have to. Do you have a better suggestion trying to keep Canale and PF accountable? As aside, we may also find out the fullness of the IAM/TWU agreement in the process. Something appears dirty.
At this point, I have to find out if the attorney is available and willing. Initially, a while back, I got a quick read of the situation and he indicated it was an interesting case that was worthy.
The support exist and Canale's plan to agree with Hemenway to pay no attention to section 6 has resulted in the latest company proposal that is treason against the masses.
Strategic Plan
regards,
Tim Nelson, email here
IAM Local Chairman, 1487, Chicago
district force,
"But him and some east leaders in PHL and CLT don't understand that the best solution is to merge the west into the east. Unfortunately there is now division on the negotiations team that will not allow Randy Canale to merge the two groups."
YOU couldn't be more WRONG in that statement. first the east has and I REPEAT has NO PROBLEM bringing the west up to our contract
however this is a transition agreement not traditional neg. so WE on the east are NOT and I REPEAT are NOT going to give up more in our
B/S contract just to do that.. IF they the company wants to bring them up fine .. DO IT ALREADY but DON'T OPEN OUR CONTRACT UP
with extensions and lose profit sharing lose change of control because it's not GOING TO HAPPEN.
Now as far as a division on the negotiations team . once again your are dead WRONG.. just because we now have people negotiating
for US the membership and not to KISS the pinky doesn't bring division. maybe the rest of the 100,000.00 club should consider representing the people that pay THERE SALARY..