Overspeed
Veteran
- Jun 27, 2011
- 3,245
- 1,065
You and James C Little have the same stats, and I am in agreement that abborgation will take place or at least that the chance is slim that Judge Lane will not grant the 1113 motion. But that must be the end of your thinking it through, what is that less than 30 days from today? That is the extent of your thinkng? What about the next 6 YEARS?
Now show me the statistics on how many of those agreements after the motion was granted were improved via negotiations that followed? Compared with some stats that show how many got worse than abrogation as negotations resumed.
My point is, you are looking only at the next 30 days, Even though Negotiations will indeed begin again.
Unless we vote YES, then we stand no chance to improve these conditions for 6 long years.
Again, you have the statisitcs that show numbers on motions granted, now show me that none of those contracts improved after abrogation in the negotiations that folllowed the granted motion and that those union members suffered 6 long years of the worst concessions ever in the industry.
Stop being so short sighted and look at the length of this DOG CRAP!
For the record, I am betting we can get a better deal in negotiations after aborgation, not in court. Stop placing words in my mouth.
I'm not putting words in your mouth. So you agree that abrogation will take place so that means that 4,300 jobs and maybe many more will be gone by the time the remaining ~5,000 get a pay raise in what? Two? Three years? That's a big win there! I'm not shortsighted in fact quite the opposite. Saying "we will get a big raise" is great when you are part of the "we". The others whose work is getting outsourced well I guess they're on their own in the future you want. Nice one percent-type mentality.