Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
You can live through the next boom cycle stuck with LOA93? I doubt it. Let's get a TA and see what happens, shall we?This ruling pretty much ensures seperate ops for the next 8 to 10 years.
You can live through the next boom cycle stuck with LOA93? I doubt it. Let's get a TA and see what happens, shall we?
If what you're saying is that after the East side contract is ammendable that the company can implement LOA 93 on both sides and implement the NIC....well....maybe you're right....but I don't see that happening.
How supremely observant of you to notice. The damages trial isn't until August.
7 or 8 years?
I guess you forgot about the RLA and section 6 negotiations for both sides when after a 30 day cooling off period the company is free to impose a CBA and the union is free to strike.
No one over here wants to live with LOA 93. However....when given a choice between LOA 93 and combined ops.....90% of east pilots will vote for continued seperate ops and LOA 93.
Outside of bankruptcy the company can't impose a contract until released from mediation and the cooling off period expires. If the final judicial remedy is the same as the draft posted earlier, there'll be no section 6 negotiations to begin the process that could ultimately end in a company imposed contract, so no imposed contract. The judge will have halted that process before it began.
Jim
Gunther,
You were sorta right if I understand your earlier post correctly. You said that you "didn't see" the company imposing a contract. I took that to mean that they wouldn't impose a contract, not that they couldn't.
I'm saying that the company can't impose a contract (other than by going into bankruptcy) because there can't be separate Section 6 negotiations if the judge's draft remedy stands.
Jim
well I'm not a pilot /lawyer/labor expert somebody needs to explain to me how it is right that an 86 hire is junior to a 99 hire??
No one over here wants to live with LOA 93. However....when given a choice between LOA 93 and combined ops.....90% of east pilots will vote for continued seperate ops and LOA 93. You guys have seriously underestimated the East pilots resolve on this matter.
Damages? What damages?