CallawayGolf
Veteran
- Nov 13, 2009
- 1,920
- 1,961
First off, those 1100+ west pilots aren’t junior to the guys below them on the NIC. They had a seniority number at AWA that was integrated with their east counterparts on a new combined list. Seniority, longevity, and DOH are all different terms with different meanings. West pilots lost seniority status in the NIC because of the top 517 protected east positions while the east gained. It’s all part of the integration process.East 25 yr guys will never see the 330 as they near retirement because 1100+ junior (hired 13 year after) guys will be above them on the Nic.
So, instead of retiring at S/N 100, they would retire at S/N 1200.
It ain't about today or tomorrow-no bump, no flush takes care of that - its 10-15 yrs down the road.
Kapeesh?
The merger resulted in more AC, more CO/FO seats and positions, more city pairs, more international flights, more and newer WB components to the fleet. You want to assume that the numerator changed while the denominator stays the same giving your downtrodden viewpoint some legs. The reality is that with the merger both the numerator and the denominator grew proportionally which is why a ratio integration of the combined groups is fair and equitable for both sides.
Ten to fifteen years down the road? As PI might say, how can you say that? Who knows what might happen down the road? Nobody. US could grow, shrink, merger, acquire, liquidate. Heck with a $14T national debt and a government with spending habits that would make a drunken sailor blush, the USA might not be here in 10 years. We could be insolvent and have communist China come over and repossess all of our government, corporate and private assets. We can play what if till the cows come home and it wouldn’t change the fact that NIC protected the east WB positions, effectively protected every pilot’s 2005 seniority positions for equipment/status, and ensured that the east pilots effectively got two positions for every one position the west received, which is roughly the size of each group’s pre-merger population. NIC got it right and you guys just keep dreaming up ways to justify your breach of contractual obligations under the TA.
Nevertheless, why don’t you just prove Tashima and Graber to be correct? Put the NIC in and get a TA out for a vote. If these prognostications are correct then it will never pass. I wonder why the east is so afraid of this strategy?