sharktooth
Veteran
- Jan 27, 2006
- 1,846
- 0
If evidence, a list, is presented that is incomplete in any way, then, as a fact, it is flawed. At least, ALPA should have presented an east list as a conditional one, resulting in some sort of conditional ordering. That there were no conditions, as such, I must believe the east list was presented as a matter of subterfuge on the part of ALPA, which makes any result depending on such a lie, as flawed.This "flawed" list is a matter of opinion.
Still confused, aren't we.We do. Against USAPA. Not ALPA. They are now the CBA as they've shouted from the rooftops - waving the flags, and jumping up and down. You guys want to play both sides of every argument. That won't work.