Nope, just saying your, mine, BS', Luv's, etc names and addresses are public information. As for the rest, not one of you have proof that complete SS# or anything else confidential was given to AOL. If it's proven, and the intent to transmit that information was present, then we can talk about that.Just like the RICO charges, you all are running around deciding who to hang before there's been a crime uncovered.Jim
Thank you for your spin, mini-me Nosum... I've never claimed that AOL didn't receive ANY information - that's a lie. I have said that none of us know how much of "truncated" SS# was contained in the file and whether either the asst chief pilot or AOL knew it was there.Jim
Normally, I'd find this game with you too boring...but the issue is too important. ( plus, I love the way you get passive/aggressive when your ass starts swallowing your boxers)
The problem with your premise, is that you consider only the SS# to be "confidential"...so you're splitting hairs. AOL (and the company) will find that releasing any private, personal information from one set of employees to another set of employees; especially since they are parties in a lawsuit, is illegal. No East pilot granted specific authority to release anything to AOL.
Further, (and yes, I have seen a East seniority list-albeit a long time ago) it contains a name, employee number, and ...wait for it: Date of Hire. As you well know, Base Alignments may show other detail. None ever show addresses, phone numbers...DOB..etc
AOL ( cactusboy1 et al) and yourself, postulate (very defensively) that all they thought they had was a seniority list. Not true.
A seniority list does not contain personal detail and address/telephone numbers....EVER.
Not to worry, because that's not what AOL wanted anyway...they wanted mailing addresses...they got 'em, and so much more. Prechillily, or whatever her name is, even said that the two MEC's exchanged seniority lists in merger talks...as is usual in those things.
No...I'm happy to remind you that what AOL has done at the very least constitutes harassment, and invasion of privacy....3000 times. Of course, that it was premeditated, and all the G-men are on it...from one set of litigants to another...FBI?
Oh, my!
kisses