CallawayGolf
Veteran
- Nov 13, 2009
- 1,920
- 1,961
Okay but your original answer did demonstrate that current vs.the potential status quo of few international destinations and fewer WB/ ETOPS aircraft and no 190's clearly shows that the east would have been worse off if Management had just maintained the minimum fleet count with old NB aircraft and didn't add the 190's. So it's not just natural attrition causing the movement, recalls and new hires. What you call that benefit seems to be the crux if the discussion. Is it expansion, growth, or what - I don't know. Sure seems to me in terms of the number of east active pilots there are more now than if the new 330's other better aircraft and new international destinations, and the 190's had never been added. These factors have nothing to do with movement due to attrition. In other words the east would have been much worse has the post-merger 2005 fleet and destinations remained the same.CallawayGolf,
I reread you question and that didn't really answer it. I have no idea since we can't really come up with how many have actually been recalled and hired. The above is more a summary of how the replacement of narrow body aircraft with wide body T/A and E190 affected employment.