Al Legheny
Advanced
- Jul 21, 2009
- 223
- 148
Here is a little more info for you since you now have such high regard for my opinion.
When you lose the LOA grievence, all the hypothetical points of what may or may not happen are moot. Personally, I think you are going to lose, so none of my prognostication will come to pass, I am just pointing out that it would be a very shallow victory at best.
Here is the flip side of the coin, and the much more likely outcome. You lose, and remain on LOA93 indefinitely, while usapa continues down its dead end DOH road. The company not willing to hitch its wagon to usapa's DFR horses, particularly when that dead end road has no cul de sac to turn the wagon around.
Further, Kasher may come back with something in his ruling that may make usapa regret filing the thing in the first place.
Spoken like a true politician. When you are caught completly flat footed and sprouting out and out lies and falsehoods change the subject to something completely different.
The East may or may not loose LOA93, that is true, that was not what I was addressing in your origional post. Are you delusional enough to believe that the company can impose contract terms when even Judge Wake stated he could not?
Your if /then statements are a joke. What may happen may happen and I don't think it will resemble anything you have posted recently. You are totally out of touch and out to lunch with your posts.