Not this time. Parker is no dope and he learns from his mistakes.
US Pilots Labor Discussion
- Thread starter Richard
- Start date
- Status
Not this time. Parker is no dope and he learns from his mistakes.
Walmartgreeter
Veteran
- Mar 6, 2003
- 1,430
- 1,143
PHL pilots,
Don't forget to vote!
http://www.jamieweidner.com/
Greeter
Don't forget to vote!
http://www.jamieweidner.com/
Greeter
Yes, and don't to forget to vote in the illegal redo of the appeals board election.
cleardirect
Veteran
- May 24, 2008
- 6,234
- 9,749
- Banned
- #39,814
You have been predicting fragmentation for over a year now. When are you going to admit reality and give up on your wrong headed thinking? But tell us smart guy since you know so much. Who is the west going to be sold to? Got to have a buyer if you want to be a seller. Show us all how smart you are.
Try looking at the facts. In an AA LCC merger PHX is safer than PHL.
The demise of the Nic was long ago foretold. Even by ALPA. Then the 9 th affirmed that prediction of the Nic never being ratified. Now the deal is being iced by Parker himself. It won't be long now, the Nic will be a distant memory.
lynyrdskynyrd
Veteran
- Apr 22, 2005
- 1,182
- 558
I thought Alpo told you usapo was the quickest way to the Nic, unaltered?
What are the scabs going to do? Are they going to follow their C&BLs and have a runoff between Mitch and AC, then a runoff between AC and Patrick, then a runoff between Patrick and whoever got the 4th greatest amount of votes, or are they showing their true scab colors and doing the entire election over, and if so, how are they going to guarantee any one candidate gets 50%+1 of the vote?
Yes the demise of the Nic was foretold, by a union busting scab lawyer, to his scab faithful who were willing to believe they could renege on binding arbitration and steal from their new found co-workers.
So, Claxhole, how did I change the Ansett history? What I am thinking is you are likely a scab from the Eastern days, and you are just trying to shift the attention away from your scab history? Either that or you were too young to have scabbed at Eastern, and/or too unqualified to even fill scab shoes, so you point out the mistakes of others to cover your tracks.
cleardirect
Veteran
- May 24, 2008
- 6,234
- 9,749
- Banned
- #39,819
Yes usapa was told they could renege on binding arbitration. The same lawyer that usapa is now suing. No honor or loyalty among thieves.
I guess since they have not gotten DOH the east had to blame someone.
Skynyrd......don't bother pointing out historical facts to the scabs, they rewrite history to fit their delusions.
ALPA did indeed point out to the scab wannabees that the only way to alter the NIc would be through West agreement to change. But, the little lawyer had a better plan of stripping the West of union representation to steal our jobs.
My guess is they will show "true scab colors". They can't help themselves.
Forgot to point out that the 9th agreed with ALPA.
Black and white, another warning to usapa. The only judges who commented on merit say usapa is bound to the Nic, and the two judges who did not discuss the "thorny issue" summize that usapa is only "at least as free as ALPA", who was not free to aboandon the Nic without West consent, and actually was bound to defend the Nic, as is usapa.
USAPA is at least as free to abandon the Nicolau Award as was
its predecessor, ALPA. The dissent appears implicitly to assume that the
Nicolau Award, the product of the internal rules and processes of ALPA,
is binding on USAPA.Black and white, another warning to usapa. The only judges who commented on merit say usapa is bound to the Nic, and the two judges who did not discuss the "thorny issue" summize that usapa is only "at least as free as ALPA", who was not free to aboandon the Nic without West consent, and actually was bound to defend the Nic, as is usapa.
I believe the term sheets call for a cap and bank system. No more flying over 90 etc. Cap set at 84 hours.
I guess my question is...and I thought perhaps you would know....is usapa going to change their C&BLs prior to any Appeals Board election...or are they just going to do a do-over with the same rules and have those results challenged.
Here is what I am thinking. If they just re-run the election, we send some scabs to prison for election fraud. If they change their C&BLs, we get Mitch, AC and Patrick awarded punative monetary damages.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
