SkiHigh is right. We used to have passingfor Reserves, however, too many people abused this right trying not to fly at all. Every frickin day" 2E,2E,2E. Alot of them were F/A's either married to a pilot or another F/A with a kid at home. All they wanted to do was sit home and collect Min. Guarantee. There was a cluase in the old contract that stated "Reserve passing is not intended to allow F/A's to have additional days off". So these people just abused the hell out of it and the company got rid of the old system. When the new system got put in place, most of those abusers either took the leave or the buyout, and we got left with squat.
TravelPro: Alot of reserves did vote for this, however, remember, we were supposed to have Pref Bid at the same time. The company put this new reserve system in(which the afa didn't balk at) and then never put Pref Bid in(which afa is ok with). I'm not sure how long you have been here, but do you remember the Reserve Override? We were supposed to get that in May of 2002,it didn't happen. So, I called the CLT union office and Hearn told me they were waiting on SAP to get finished and that I might have been a Lineholder. I told him I might ahve been an Astronaut also, but that I was a Reserve F/A and to cut me a check. SAP didn't come along until Nov 2002(5 month delay inwhich the company saved approx. $400,000 at the expense of the Reserves) and I was still a Reserve. Then in 2003, our union let the company take back the Reserve Override and guess what, let them keep SAP for the Lineholders. Just another instance where our union screwed the Reserves.
N109UW,
Just for clairty sake and getting the facts in order:
SAP came in Aug. of 2001.
The reserve override and also
over 14-year longevity pay was given back to the company as part of concession #1 which was ratified on Aug. 9, 2002. Everything in concession #1 had a snap back by 2008 and reserve override had a snap back of .50 by 2006, and $1 by 2008. The longevity pay (which has nothing to do with being a lineholder or reserve; but rather years of service) was to snap back at the end of 2008.
Unfortunately, since concession #1 in 2002, we have gone through 2 bankruptcies and 2 more concessions. Each worse than the first and much deeper. Instead of the company instituting a new business plan, they made labor pay for a failed one. Because of this management's lack of vision, they could only come up with a merger. Some of those execs bailed and some got to keep their jobs, promoted with raises.
Point being, and why I bring this up, is that many f/as forget and blame the union leaders for their plight. They forget their role in this, and act like passive bystanders.
The old BOD and new BOD rewarded those execs who were responsible for a failing business plan and Labor who saved the company from liquidating twice, kept the operation going so that all the execs could collect hefty monthly pay checks, while labor waited for who among them would get axed next. The company made sure that they continued the psychological war-fare with continued threats to control the masses to keep the company going and keep making you feel that you had no value to the company and wouldn't find a job any where else. (I have an e-mail from some top execs specifically Dave S. that actually say this dated Nov. 24, 2002 no less).
Unfortunately, apathy was contagious and with our particular group, the f/as were not listening to the union reps...except PIT members who knew their worth.
One more thing regarding Pref-bid...it was never negotiated to be instituted at the same time as the LTO. The negotiators fought for having them instituted the same time in the 5-day negotiations, Winter 2002, but not what the company would agree to. The MEC knew if it was instituted the same time, there would be a huge delay for LTO because Pref-bid was taking years to put in place and that would delay job losses. Both systems get rid of more f/as for your fyi...so the MEC, by majority was against the LTO system as well as pref-bid because of that consequence. And for those reasons the company pushed to institute these concessions and not have any impedment or restrictions to do so.
Rant over.