I also asked you and AAA73Pilot:
If everyone keeps what they had, to include your own international flying and attrition, shouldn't it also include one's proximity to the unemployment line? Under your plan, a reduction in work force puts West captains on the street and your recent furloughees in their jobs. How do you reconcile this? I don't think it rings sincere to say you want everyone to keep what they brought to the table, except the baggage and misfortune that you had. That should belong to someone else?
If you want to have protections to keep your attrition and resulting upgrades, then the West should keep theirs as well, in addition to the jobs they came with. The last person recalled should be the first person furloughed next time. Isn't this how it always worked?
I'm really trying to understand this. How about a real explanation without the wise cracks and sarcasm.
What about you, AAA73Pilot? I really want both of your straight responses to these questions. I'm honestly not being confrontational. Just attempting to understand your point of view.