Take this for what it's worth..... in discussions with an AGC it was revealed that the company will infact roll the west into the east if this T/A is voted down.
They WILL NOT go back for another negotiation, they only did this time b/c of maintenance.
Also, they said that this will leave the 18 field stations suseptible to closure sooner than the 3 years that's in the new tentative.
I know I sound like DF but this is in fact what I was told...just putting it out there.....
Where have you been? Canale,AGCs, NCs along with the Maids at lake Placid have
been saying this in one variation or another. But to my knowlege none has
spoken to the reality as to how this could occur. Just assuming that LLC and IAM
would both agree to this is a stretch IMO. Then there's the question as to
whether a valid contract could be changed without a vote of those affected.
The change of scope alone for the west is huge. Maybe you can get these guys
to explain how that could happen. Nobody I know of has ever gotten an explantion.
I'm not saying one doesn't exist or that their isn't some leagal precident for it.
But to date we have heard zilch other than Canale's carefully crafted statements,
or other less subtle blurts.
BTW if it was taken to the west for a vote it just might pass. That would be a
pretty big loss for a lot of west stations on the list.
Has the east lost any stations since the merger? Are there any that since the
merger have fallen below the number for over a year?
I'm assuming your talking about PF. If so he came to our station, made these
kinds of statements about the west into the east, and was asked if he
had some more info as to how this would be possible. He said he'd get
back to us with that info. But It would be very hard to believe that he
doesn't know all there is to know on the subject as we speak.
If you know something else please tell us. But like I say I have never
heard anyone even try to defend this idea with any thing more that
saying it could happen. Mike 33 had a conversation with an LLC neg.
who said it could happen because the value of the Sept TA was greater
than the value of the east and west contract. Or something like that.
It made absolutely no sence to me. BTW PF dismissed this idea.
Thanks BF
PS I used my brothers mac computer on my last post with spell check.
No such luck on my cheapo pile. (Is that the way to spell cheepo?)