Not true. The judge rules on abrogating the CBA only, he does write a contract or rule on individual items to change. The Company has the right to implement changes and disregard the entire contract if they want. We also have the right to continue negotiating after abrogation however the Company not give us what is in the Final Best Offer. The FBO is an "offer" not the "ask" that's in the 1113c filing.
Look read the opinion it is written by your attorney Sharon Levine it is clear even to a #### house attorney what she is saying Read and comprehend.
"Previously it was unclear what right a debtor has to impose employment terms after exhausting the §1113 process. Did the debtor have the right unilaterally to impose any conditions? Or could the debtor impose the terms of its very first §1113 proposal? Judge Gropper’s decision makes clear that it is the terms of the last tentative agreement or if there is none, the debtor’s last proposal, that the debtor may impose."