CallawayGolf
Veteran
- Nov 13, 2009
- 1,920
- 1,961
The crux of the issue is not who has or who wants what. Its not about being willing to survive on a bankruptcy wage agreement and onerous work rules. USAPA has a federally-mandated duty to represent all pilots of US Airways fairly and equally in their role as the sole bargaining agent. They are also required to negotiate in good faith with Management to attain a new JCBA and they are now under the NMB rules to do just that. Unlike the individual pilots themselves, USAPA cannot simply say that they dont want to negotiate with Management. Because USAPA is required to negotiate, they will have to address section 22. The west pilots and Management believe USAPAs interpretation of the Transition Agreement and the 9th ruling on ripeness is contrary to the law.9'er, that is the crux of the whole issue here. It's what the East has to offer, not what the West has.
This is the crux of the issue. USAPA is caught between a rock and a hard place because the east pilots dont want a new contract with the NIC but USAPA is required to negotiate with Management regardless of what the east pilots want, and they must do so in such a way that does not constitute a failure of their DFR responsibilities. This task is impossible so long a Management refuses to accept a non-NIC list which forces USAPA into a position that they cant effectively get out of. So, you will very likely not get what you want which I interpret to be status quo until retirement.