Your Captain's ego is showing - I'm sure that those 160+ people that are on the payroll becasue of the 190's don't consider the presence of the E190's "a little"...
Your biggest problem is a refusal to separate pre-merger from post-merger. Thus you see absolutely nothing wrong with the East getting every airplane arrival not needed to keep the west at min-fleet despite the clear TA language that USAPA fails to enforce.
Jim
I'm sure 9 out of 10 of the EMB pilots would like to be on an airplane that pays more. When I was flying it a lot of the F/Os would have rather been furloughed or take a leave, but the company wouldn't let them.
You really should look in the mirror before you tell anyone about problems. We have every airplane needed to keep the east above the min fleet! That is except the EMBs, and that was handled by either an arbitrator or agreement, I can't remember, but it was worked out with the west getting an IOU. I think they should have gotten some, and probably some of the new 330s(as I've said before, but when has that ever stopped you from running your mouth?), but the company put them where they wanted and to keep the fleets on both sides near the min. Why is it that you worry so much about the west being at the min fleet and not the east? Do you acknowledge that the east has less hulls than 2005?