US Pilots Labor Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
It looks like someone's math skills are no better than his verbal ones. Let's use the tried and true expression: PROVE IT!

If over a thousand east pilots were stapled under Nic, how can it be possible that EF's relative position, over his career, cannot be better with the Nic than AWA stand alone, or DOH? That's what the chart shows, clearly.

You must have not read the whole thing because there were two charts. The first one does indeed compare USAPA's list to the Nic, as well as AWA stand alone.
CLOWN, when did we merge? You have to use the data of when we merged not the data from 2011 to chart eric's list progression. Also there is only one chart, they repeat the chart in the back of the book. You want me to PROVE to you that the west has 400 less pilots and 22 less airplanes from when we were deemed single carrier? I don't know how you possibly cannot know that. Looks like you clowns want a do over based on todays positions, not when we merged almost 6 years ago.
 
CLOWN, when did we merge? You have to use the data of when we merged not the data from 2011 to chart eric's list progression. Also there is only one chart, they repeat the chart in the back of the book. You want me to PROVE to you that the west has 400 less pilots and 22 less airplanes from when we were deemed single carrier? I don't know how you possibly cannot know that. Looks like you clowns want a do over based on todays positions, not when we merged almost 6 years ago.

You are making a idiot of yourself(bigger?). Take the blinders off, and really, really think about what the charts show, and what what you are saying does not make any difference.

Two charts, one with two lines, one with three, for the came guy.
 
It looks like someone's math skills are no better than his verbal ones. Let's use the tried and true expression: PROVE IT!

If over a thousand east pilots were stapled under Nic, how can it be possible that EF's relative position, over his career, cannot be better with the Nic than AWA stand alone, or DOH? That's what the chart shows, clearly.

You must have not read the whole thing because there were two charts. The first one does indeed compare USAPA's list to the Nic, as well as AWA stand alone.

Have not seen the chart yet, but, the first falacy in your statement is that a 1000 east pilots were stapled under the Nic. I do suppose you prefaced it with If though.
 
You are making a idiot of yourself(bigger?). Take the blinders off, and really, really think about what the charts show, and what what you are saying does not make any difference.

Two charts, one with two lines, one with three, for the came guy.
Clown, first it's an AGE vs POSITION chart, so right there it's meaningless, second it's the same exact chart printed twice. Tell me Clown are you scabs claiming you want a DOB list now?
 
For those that haven't seen the east mailer, they use a chart based on the persons age and where they sit on the list, so it has no bearing on anything (i.e. at 50 eric will be 60% on west list standalone but 50% with usapa's doh plan, these clowns are something else.) In other words they take age and compare it to an east pilot the same age and the % position on the list. Pi you need to explain yourself you silly Clown, is usapa saying we should have an age based list?
 
Have not seen the chart yet, but, the first falacy in your statement is that a 1000 east pilots were stapled under the Nic. I do suppose you prefaced it with If though.

I thought about 1500, all the furloghed list, were stapled to the bottom. How many were there? I don't have the nic in front of me.
 
For those that haven't seen the east mailer, they use a chart based on the persons age and where they sit on the list, so it has no bearing on anything (i.e. at 50 eric will be 60% on west list standalone but 50% with usapa's doh plan, these clowns are something else.) In other words they take age and compare it to an east pilot the same age and the % position on the list. Pi you need to explain yourself you silly Clown, is usapa saying we should have an age based list?

Fodase,

Your posts would perhaps be more respected for their content if you would simply drop the "clown" thing. It does nothing to enhance your credibility and is really quite sophomoric. Stick to the issue, make a point without the bling please.
 
It is reasonable to believe? Gotta luv it, it is also reasonable like, SAN, LAS, LAX , BWI, will be closed pilots will be displaced and we all out EAST are very familiar with SWA and what happens next, it is reasonable to say DP will put NO AMOUNT of money on the table, just like the F/A's to capture any synergy worth the cost! REASONABLE to say! MM! We stand on the moral, logical and experienced higher ground!

MM,

Thanks for the cogent, well written post. Now if I only knew someone who spoke MUTANDIS, I might understand it!
 
Sorry 924ps, the clowns are completely obtuse, facts and reason means nothing to a group of emotional and spiness clowns. I will continue to call them what they are, clowns.
 
For those that haven't seen the east mailer, they use a chart based on the persons age and where they sit on the list, so it has no bearing on anything (i.e. at 50 eric will be 60% on west list standalone but 50% with usapa's doh plan, these clowns are something else.) In other words they take age and compare it to an east pilot the same age and the % position on the list. Pi you need to explain yourself you silly Clown, is usapa saying we should have an age based list?

Does Eric's age correspond to a date, like the rest of us? I'm guessing the author changed date to age to emphasize his age, but those graphs we put out years ago and show the effect of the nic going forward .

I led you there, drink up.
 
I thought about 1500, all the furloghed list, were stapled to the bottom. How many were there? I don't have the nic in front of me.
Clown, tell me about the usapa chart, why is it an age based chart? What does Anyones age have to do with a seniority list?
 
Does Eric's age correspond to a date, like the rest of us? I'm guessing the author changed date to age to emphasize his age, but those graphs we put out years ago and show the effect of the nic going forward .

I led you there, drink up.
Why is it an age vs. Position chart? Did all the clowns get hired by dob?
 
Clown, tell me about the usapa chart, why is it an age based chart? What does Anyones age have to do with a seniority list?

Tell ya what, you tell me Eric's age and I will help you with the math needed to convert the graph to dates. Deal?
 
Tell ya what, you tell me Eric's age and I will help you with the math needed to convert the graph to dates. Deal?
Good God man. Leonidas pamphlet provided you a seniority chart, usapa's chart is Eric's AGE VS. Eric's Seniority Percentage. I ask you again what does Eric's Age vs. seniority position have to do with anything? Please explain to me why and AGE chart is used?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top