- Feb 10, 2011
- 1,647
- 5,392
Hypocrisy Revealed- What Seham
Was Saying to the TWA Pilots
During the Addington Trial
Beginning in 2008, Lee Seham argued in Federal
the arbitrated award in the Addington trial. At
the same time in other litigation, Seham argued
that it was wrong for the TWA pilots’ union to
concede their arbitration rights. In a 73-page
brief offered as expert testimony in another
lawsuit, Seham argued that ALPA coerced the
TWA-MEC to forfeit their arbitration rights per
Allegheny-Mohawk. “ALPA’s conduct toward
the TWA pilots was arbitrary, discriminatory and
in bad faith.” [Lee Seham, Nov 14, 2008, brief,
Pg11]
Seham argued that it was a DFR violation to
in order to gain favor with the larger group of
opposite in court by stating that USAPA does
not violate its Duty of Fair Representation by
Seham simply telling USAPA leaders what they
want to hear to gain access to our union’s funds?
Seham said that placing 1200 TWA pilots (all
of whom were actively employed at the time of
the AA merger) was “harshly unfair…” but he
supported (and continues to support) “stapling”
over 1400 West pilots at the same time!
“The agreement … between American
and its pilots union stapled over 1200 of
the 2250 TWA pilots to the bottom of the
merged list. 409 AA pilots who were not
even on the payroll at the time … were
placed above … TWA pilots.” Seham
went on to say, “There is no dispute that
this seniority integration was harshly
unfair….” [Nov 14, 2008 Expert Report of
Lee Seham, pg. 1]
Is Seham advancing USAPA’s strategy because it
with unlimited access to our union’s funds?
Was Saying to the TWA Pilots
During the Addington Trial
Beginning in 2008, Lee Seham argued in Federal
the arbitrated award in the Addington trial. At
the same time in other litigation, Seham argued
that it was wrong for the TWA pilots’ union to
concede their arbitration rights. In a 73-page
brief offered as expert testimony in another
lawsuit, Seham argued that ALPA coerced the
TWA-MEC to forfeit their arbitration rights per
Allegheny-Mohawk. “ALPA’s conduct toward
the TWA pilots was arbitrary, discriminatory and
in bad faith.” [Lee Seham, Nov 14, 2008, brief,
Pg11]
Seham argued that it was a DFR violation to
in order to gain favor with the larger group of
opposite in court by stating that USAPA does
not violate its Duty of Fair Representation by
Seham simply telling USAPA leaders what they
want to hear to gain access to our union’s funds?
Seham said that placing 1200 TWA pilots (all
of whom were actively employed at the time of
the AA merger) was “harshly unfair…” but he
supported (and continues to support) “stapling”
over 1400 West pilots at the same time!
“The agreement … between American
and its pilots union stapled over 1200 of
the 2250 TWA pilots to the bottom of the
merged list. 409 AA pilots who were not
even on the payroll at the time … were
placed above … TWA pilots.” Seham
went on to say, “There is no dispute that
this seniority integration was harshly
unfair….” [Nov 14, 2008 Expert Report of
Lee Seham, pg. 1]
Is Seham advancing USAPA’s strategy because it
with unlimited access to our union’s funds?