That means that the company won't move off the nic. Until a court gives them immunity for doing so.
US Pilots Labor Discussion
- Thread starter Richard
- Start date
- Status
NOT going to happen. We will keep LOA93 anyday over the NIC.
BINDING ARBITRATION does not mean RATIFICATION.
Prepare to retire on LOA93, we dont care!
And news flash to you - NOS and thousands of others feel the same way.
Reed Richards
Veteran
- Sep 2, 2009
- 1,389
- 1,161
Don't put words in my mouth. Of course the courts can find for a DFR. But that is rarely the case, especially on appeal (Addington, Rakestraw, etc.)
I understand completely, and without fantasy, that USAPA could be held responsible for a DFR as to the seniority list. Despite the ramblings of an errant Arizona judge, the Ninth (backed up by SCOTUS) just told all of us the list had to be in a ratified contract prior to being subject to a DFR. Guess you missed that one while out cashing your PBGC check (thanks to ALPA)
RR
Not necessaily, I think I might like Dougs idea of an alphabetical list how about you?
N924PS
Veteran
- May 9, 2004
- 2,036
- 1,529
News flash to you-DOH NOT going to happen.
I have already accepeted that my remaining years here will be under LOA93. If you happen to also retire under LOA93, well you deserve it.
I think there are a couple of thousand pilots at USAirways that feel just as I do. We're just not the majority yet, but the longer this drags on, more will want to move on to better pay and working conditions.
RATIFICATION OF DOH=DFR II
sumadarson
Veteran
- Nov 17, 2010
- 851
- 905
You are spinning for the future, getting ready for the inevitability of the companies declaratory judgment being dismissed. There is no history of a court giving immunity to a party for any future legal situations, you know that.
Having a aol badge backer now is proof of being unable to grasp or deal with reality and paying for it monetarily.
So what is the problem? Why is section 22 not closed?
sumadarson
Veteran
- Nov 17, 2010
- 851
- 905
DFR II = 5 + years + badge backing = same results.
Besides, the airline will be split up shortly, there will be no one to DFR in the future.
My goal of pointing out the mentally challenged, the hypocrites, liars, the motives of alpa shills and those who only were able to rid their bodies of CO2 and felt entitlement, is complete.
I wish you luck in your future endeavors.
I'll play. So what do you think the company will do if they don't receive immunity or the case is dismissed?
As i said earlier, it will probably never get to this.
Do you really think Doug wants the extra costs associated with a new contract?
Thats easy enough.....APPEAL. Doug has already said that. More delay tactics.
Doug already knows the courts will not give immunity, he is just not telling us this. Courts deal with facts, not speculation. There would be too much speculation to presume to know what Usapa would present or what the company would accept that may or may not bring harm to the west.
Nope, Doug wants a cost neutral contract, and that is the point. If he could, he would give u doh tomorrow in exchange. Doug would happily throw the west under the bus. He hasn't and he won't because the company's lawyers told him he couldn't .
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
