BoeingBoy
Veteran
- Nov 9, 2003
- 16,512
- 5,865
- Banned
- #316
Then explain why the LOA 93 award, whichever way it goes, is going to be final and binding, and the Nic is not.
According to one of the USAPA cheerleaders, a lawyer involved in the LOA 93 grievance said that whoever wins the arbitration, the other side will take it to court, so the grievance award isn't so "final and binding" according to that post. You guys really do need to huddle and get your stories straight. One says the LOA arb will be final and binding, another says not so. One says USAPA is free to negotiate whatever seniority list it wants because DOH is acknowledged as being within the "wide latitude" of what's acceptable, another says "nobody" is saying that USAPA can do that. One says toe-may-toe and another says no - it's toe-ma-toe...
Personally I think all but a few of USAPA supporters are just making it up as you go - saying whatever is necessary to refute whatever the other side says.
Jim