Okay.
I just completed another online CFI renewal course. Updated from the original Fundamentals of Instruction booklet here are the common defense mechanisms exhibited by flight trainees: Repression, Denial, Compensation, Projection, Rationalization, Reaction Formation, Fantasy, and Displacement. You get extra credit for utilizing almost every one simultaneously.
717- your counsel did you a tremendous disservice going down the ripeness path. Yes, you are correct. They did make one ruling only. That is because that was the one issue of contention- RIPENESS. It was not ripe. They did not say it would be ripe in the future, they did not say it would not. Yes, USAPA has to represent the west. Agreed. Damage is the next point of contention. Seems we have a disparate view of the definition of damage. A term thrown around freely by the West as if it can be simply plucked from the sky, and employed as a threat at will. We shall see about that definition going forward. Seems you have a far different view of damage from a lot of other people, but whatever, that is your prerogative. But here is what the 9th really did, and this is a real gem. You got them to reveal their opinion of the use of Nicolau. I really think Jacobs must have cringed when he saw that little dissertation. I don't think it really has sunk in on you guys. I know Jacobs was not happy.He must have been looking around at the rest of the brain trust and realized he took you guys way farther than intended. And there it is, black and white. On the top? The NINTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN FRANCISCO. It just doesn't get a better pedigree than that! They opened up a nasty little can of smelly worms that went all around the Nicolau. Now you, can act like it means nothing,but this is understandable. You have been led around at will by a lot of pilots who are really way out of their league in this.And expended two million dollars for a complete clarification that favored your opponent! That is your choice to believe Koontz, Johhny Mac and Vasin. But a lot of us were smiling when that came out. You just gave a green light to USAPA with regard to the use of the Nic, and you paid for it.
Oooh, was he the one wearing the outdated, crumpled uniform with the schmutz on the sleeves?
We relish the opportunity to show you where you stand on the numbers.
If you say so. 🙄
Thanks for participating! I thought I saw a west guy there burning his plutonium badge backer. Confirmed!
If you say so. Funny Jetzz. Justice Tashima says it clearly, and you put a rolleyes on it and say IF YOU SAY SO. What does a UAL pilot please tell wish us to go over on the USAir Forum?
First of all, please learn to use more paragraphs for easier viewing.
What don't you understand about the word 'irrelevant'? They can reveal any opinion they like and it has no bearing. A jury decided USAPA was guilty of violating its DFR and the 9th did not and cannot change that.
Johnny Mac and Vasin aren't part of the AOL. But in any case, my choice to support the AOL is an educated one.
Really? Where's your wet-dream DOH list? Seriously, where is it? Has the company accepted it and if not, why?
Why thank you Chief Justice 767 Jetzzz! Look at what is written, from start to finshing period. What you said means nothing. I'll take what Tashima said thank you. Unbelievable how you can take a simple statement from a Justice, and at will put your take on it. It says EXACTLY what is says, and NOTHING else, and you know it.
To name a few, since you asked: The Cleary recall effort. Contract negotiations status. LOA93 grievance. The company's request for clarification. Future DFR litigation. Types of C&R's USAPA is considering.
Maybe he wanted to wear what he had on. Give the guy a break. I've had it with you guys.
I LOVE the fact that my name keeps gaining more and more "z's" as time goes on. Now I'm a Chief Justice. COOL! I'm flattered by all the attention. B)
Does this mean the COWARDLY LEADERSHIP at USAPA is going to "show us" on a contact vote with the NIC, "Where you stand" ?
