E
EastUS
Guest
YOU put the MEC......
Try again
Flip
Explain to me, in some/ANY reasonable detail, if at all possible, exactly how "YOU"/I had anything to do with even so much as who was on the MEC?
Why don't you "Try again"? 🙄
YOU put the MEC......
Try again
Flip
If you didn't like your MEC or MC voice your concern or beyond that RECALL those that put these people in place (MEC and MC).
Can you redefine your statement? In that merger, there was no "east." It was north and south.
And I don't recall who was struck, but I do know that Sam Kagel was the arbitrator, went straight DOH with very small conditions and restrictions which had very short time limits.
Really.The pilot running for PHX domiclie rep recorded an offensive video describing USAPA. This video that is readily available on the internet, mirrors the attitude from the West side. This attitude has not made it easy for USAPA to function out West.
The originating group of pilots that formed USAPA, have shown courage and dedication that resulted in forming a union that represents all pilots of USAairways. Some west posters claim that it was just a way to get around the Nicolau decision, it was much more than that. Alpa turned their back on USAirways pilots for the last time. There is no joint operations until a collective bargaining agreement, the West fails to mention why this was part of the process. It was a fail safe back up that had an arbitration award gone awry in mind.
The "Goat Video".
Justification is a strange thing. Some people can rationalize anything in their own mind.
Really.
How many other arbitrations have "gone awry"? There is not a fail safe in arbitrations. The fail safe is it is final and binding so you better make a reaonable offer to start.
So what is the fail safe if the company wins the snap back. What do they have to get out of an awry deal?
Justification is a strange thing. Some people can rationalize anything in their own mind.
What is your opinion of the gentleman that is running for PHX rep?Really.
How many other arbitrations have "gone awry"? There is not a fail safe in arbitrations. The fail safe is it is final and binding so you better make a reaonable offer to start.
So what is the fail safe if the company wins the snap back. What do they have to get out of an awry deal?
Justification is a strange thing. Some people can rationalize anything in their own mind.
Nothing is ever their fault in entitlementville.
Such arrogance from the east.
What part of "binding" don't they get?
Effectively, you are cor4rect in what you say. Personally, I blame Kirch from the east MC for the entire fiasco. He was salivating at the thought that we could get Nicolau to be the arbitrator. What insanity. His nearsightedness at choosing Nicolau could only be surpassed by his arrogance through the entire process.
The day Nicolau was chosen, I told everyone who would listen that the outcome would mirror the Shuttle merger, as Nicolau was a one-trick pony. And sure enough, tired old George came through in spades.
With the Shuttle merger behind us (admittedly it worked out well for the USAir pilots,) the east MC should have struck Nicolau at the first opportunity. But, they had the "we know better" mentality. And here we are.
1 Many. I did not say there is a fail safe in arbitration's, you love to put words in the mouth of others. Separate operations for USAairways until a pilot contract is voted on, has been fail safe thus far.
2 Refer to line 1
3 Refer to line 1
There is no joint operations until a collective bargaining agreement, the West fails to mention why this was part of the process. It was a fail safe back up that had an arbitration award gone awry in mind.
Do you not even know what you write or are you so pathological that you can not see the facts in front of your eyes? Those are your words.
How do you guys expect to hold a conversation when you will not or can not accept your own facts?
USAPA violated its Duty to Fairly Represent the West from its inception. Hence, an offensive video was well-deserved.The pilot running for PHX domiclie rep recorded an offensive video describing USAPA.
There's an easy way to improve the West's attitude.This attitude has not made it easy for USAPA to function out West.
A certain letter shown in open court showed very well what the West already knew.Some west posters claim that it was just a way to get around the Nicolau decision, it was much more than that.
Scapegoating is alive and well. Airtran voted in ALPA last year. Do you pity them?Alpa turned their back on USAirways pilots for the last time.
So lemme ask you this: ignoring for a moment the federal judge and jury does imposing your own seniority list that you feel is fair (but the other side doesn't) sound like a reasonable solution?There is no joint operations until a collective bargaining agreement, the West fails to mention why this was part of the process. It was a fail safe back up that had an arbitration award gone awry in mind.
1 You have said that the goat video is appropriate.USAPA violated its Duty to Fairly Represent the West from its inception. Hence, an offensive video was well-deserved.
There's an easy way to improve the West's attitude.
A certain letter shown in open court showed very well what the West already knew.
Scapegoating is alive and well. Airtran voted in ALPA last year. Do you pity them?
So lemme ask you this: ignoring for a moment the federal judge and jury does imposing your own seniority list that you feel is fair (but the other side doesn't) sound like a reasonable solution?
Phoenix,
Loved the anagram post, by far your best ever. Only problem, they are not true anagrams, as you are using letters more than once etc. But still enjoyed it.

1 I do not recall those being my words. Words in others mouth by you again. My quote "There is no joint operations until a collective bargaining agreement, the West fails to mention why this was part of the process. It was a fail safe back up that had an arbitration award gone awry in mind."
2 What do you think about the America West pilot that produced the "Goat Video"? Second attempt at a conversation with you.