TWU negotiations.........what?

Frank, I had to come back because:
A) wife wouldve been miserable/didn't want to leave Tulsa
B) Puget Sound area WAY too liberal for me
C)" area way too expensive
D) ex-airline mechs are a bad fit at the lazy B(was told this before I went)
E) pretty much had to go to Boe-was a sch at AA before-no chance of getting mech posi
F)all the mech jobs at WN, UP, AK or DL are still fairly competitive. AA TULE apparently wasn't that attractive to many exp mechs.hence the long ext posting duration for TULE
G)at this juncture/age, I have to think about my retirement & getting a home paid off. Decisions are a bit more critical than say, a 30 y/o guy.-but the wife factor/ SEA thing was major issues.
REPUBLICON= u get what u deserve,u can look at IAM pay scale at Boeing and see a grade 4 installtion mech tops out at more than an AA mech and u dont need a license! WOW !
 
Couldn't let those native Americans have all that valuable oil and natural gas, now, could we?

I've been to Okiehoma a few times and it's much nicer than most middle-eastern oil nations.
 
Yes, but apparently it is in the top ten most depressing states according to a recent survey on depression...
 
REPUBLICON= u get what u deserve,u can look at IAM pay scale at Boeing and see a grade 4 installtion mech tops out at more than an AA mech and u dont need a license! WOW !

Got any proof that either of the Evil Two Parties have anything to with your claim?
Interesting how those that worship one party, blame the other party, yet there is not any proof of those claims.
It is as if emotions and trained behavior is more powerful than simple facts or truth.


Just show me any proof that a Pro-Democrat or Anti-Republican force is responsible and that Boeing Pay is a drect result of any political leaning.

I believe the Democrats have controlled the State House and Senate in Oklahoma for most of my 28 years at AA.
Why haven't they got me and other AMT's top pay?

What does the alias "Mr. RED" really stand for anyway?
 
Again nice research......... 8 years ago when i was president, my kids were in school all day, so if there was a conference call with my kids in the background,it was most likely on my time or on the weekend. I held conference calls all the time to keep the board up to date. secondly, I did not start the construction business untill after I was removed as President. please stop embarassing your self and answer my question

what have you done in any failed attempt or successfully to help benefit the members? cricket.....cricket.....cricket.....

Chuck, you have your version of the truth in your head. When I was a board member my President would have the speaker phone on and we were joking about hearing your kids in the background. And that was during the week when you were supposed to be at work not at home.

So now you know I used to be on a local e board for many years after the maintenance locals started. I have been a shop steward in the past and worked arbitrating cases. Had enough of listening to people such as yourself pump up our members on BS stories of fields of gold. In the very next breath people like you would find ways to make sleeping on the job okay, farm out tank work because so-called mechanics did not want to do it, and protect whiners who want more money and don't even know the meaning of real work.

You want accountability for management but real accountability starts with yourself.
 
Yes, but apparently it is in the top ten most depressing states according to a recent survey on depression...
Is that because the wages are depressed?

Or because the company chose to relocate?

Or it keeps the riffraff out?
 
Forced to stay? No one is forced to stay anywhwere, it is a choice.

If that's directed at me, easy for you to say. I choose to recognize marriage is a two way street Buck.
There's a little more to it-marriage trouble when I left for Boeing-but repaired while commuting back/forth. Besides, her folks are as my own. And both of mine are gone on to be with the Lord. Plus, just too many BS issues with the 787 prog/Puget Sound area. uh-uh....wasn't gonna work for me/us.

I sometimes think that some of you guys that have had the luxury of being secure in your employment with AA for the last 20+ yrs(or so), really have no idea of what kind of a jungle it is out there. In spite of the numbers posted/seen, AMT jobs in comml aviation is still quite competitve and your odds of landing a job start to drop when reach your 50s. It's not hard to figure your age & companys are keenly aware of the increased likelyhood of gimped knees, backs and a host of other ailments that accompany guys my age.

Not raggin on anybody. But I read this board a whole lot more than I post(in hopes of some good rumour control info ;) ........just brings a snort/smile some of the stuff I read on here about the employment/opportunitys out there. I hope I/we don't have to find out-(again).
 
REPUBLICON= u get what u deserve,u can look at IAM pay scale at Boeing and see a grade 4 installtion mech tops out at more than an AA mech and u dont need a license! WOW !

What are you doing at AA then? Go for it bubba...just be prepared for a HUGE increase in cost of living, housing & taxes for everything you use, do & enjoy. And stuck on stupid to no end(and a whole host of other lists of BS you must comply with at that corp welfare behemoth known as the lazy B, multitudes of clueless people that have no idea in the world how an airline environment operates)nor do they care. "We build the planes!" :rolleyes:

AMTs at Boe are a grade 9(QA 10). They currently top at 37.07(1.50-wow lic prem, 2nd shift.75c, mids .10c-again wow). Good thing, they need every penny of it. There's a lot of OT hogs at Boe that'll lie to there mothers to wk every weekend. Scabs galore too. My feeling is, Boe will eventually bust the IAM up there-or very least transform it into another twu/AA sweetheart relationship. Almost there now...
Btw, a grade 5(unlic pos $32.74/hr, grade 4 $31.71)-not real sure, but I'm thinking that gr 5 is a QA pos in the factory that'll top an AA AMTs pay.(we're at around 32/hr top, right?-I never even was handed a twu contract book at new hire orien-(yes I know it's on jetnet)....the IAM at Boe gave us that at orientation)
But then....last time I checked, Boeing makes a little more money than AA. Of course, if the AMTs there actually had a craft union negotiating there contracts instead of another "catch all" union with every other group riding the AMTs, they probably could nego about $48/50 hr for it's pre-flight/delivery line mechs.
Esp considering how few there are compared to the factory bunch. But that goes cross grained to the ind unions twisted logic doesn't it? Nevermind...

Like Informer eluded to....I've never felt like a union man had to vote straight party line Dem. I've never seen that bunch actually demonstrate to me there superior legislative powers for the "working man"....except of course, for there taxes. Which I get homicidal over, if button pushed.
Neither party represents the American party any more. But we don't need to get off on that rabbit trail....
 
Yes, but apparently it is in the top ten most depressing states according to a recent survey on depression...

I can attest to being poor is depressing Eric. And this is a poor state.
The twu & AA know it as well, and clearly intend on continuing to exploit that little fact.
 
If that's directed at me, easy for you to say. I choose to recognize marriage is a two way street Buck.
There's a little more to it-marriage trouble when I left for Boeing-but repaired while commuting back/forth. Besides, her folks are as my own. And both of mine are gone on to be with the Lord. Plus, just too many BS issues with the 787 prog/Puget Sound area. uh-uh....wasn't gonna work for me/us.

I sometimes think that some of you guys that have had the luxury of being secure in your employment with AA for the last 20+ yrs(or so), really have no idea of what kind of a jungle it is out there. In spite of the numbers posted/seen, AMT jobs in comml aviation is still quite competitve and your odds of landing a job start to drop when reach your 50s. It's not hard to figure your age & companys are keenly aware of the increased likelyhood of gimped knees, backs and a host of other ailments that accompany guys my age.

Not raggin on anybody. But I read this board a whole lot more than I post(in hopes of some good rumour control info ;) ........just brings a snort/smile some of the stuff I read on here about the employment/opportunitys out there. I hope I/we don't have to find out-(again).
Not specifically directed at you, however as you say I have not had the "opportunity" to experience the industry as you have.
Sorry to hear about your issues with getting older, it does come to all of us eventually. Me, Two new shoulders, two new hips and a kidney. So yea being in one place has been a blessing for me.
 
What are you doing at AA then? Go for it bubba...just be prepared for a HUGE increase in cost of living, housing & taxes for everything you use, do & enjoy. And stuck on stupid to no end(and a whole host of other lists of BS you must comply with at that corp welfare behemoth known as the lazy B, multitudes of clueless people that have no idea in the world how an airline environment operates)nor do they care. "We build the planes!" :rolleyes:

AMTs at Boe are a grade 9(QA 10). They currently top at 37.07(1.50-wow lic prem, 2nd shift.75c, mids .10c-again wow). Good thing, they need every penny of it. There's a lot of OT hogs at Boe that'll lie to there mothers to wk every weekend. Scabs galore too. My feeling is, Boe will eventually bust the IAM up there-or very least transform it into another twu/AA sweetheart relationship. Almost there now...
Btw, a grade 5(unlic pos $32.74/hr, grade 4 $31.71)-not real sure, but I'm thinking that gr 5 is a QA pos in the factory that'll top an AA AMTs pay.(we're at around 32/hr top, right?-I never even was handed a twu contract book at new hire orien-(yes I know it's on jetnet)....the IAM at Boe gave us that at orientation)
But then....last time I checked, Boeing makes a little more money than AA. Of course, if the AMTs there actually had a craft union negotiating there contracts instead of another "catch all" union with every other group riding the AMTs, they probably could nego about $48/50 hr for it's pre-flight/delivery line mechs.Esp considering how few there are compared to the factory bunch. But that goes cross grained to the ind unions twisted logic doesn't it? Nevermind...

Like Informer eluded to....I've never felt like a union man had to vote straight party line Dem. I've never seen that bunch actually demonstrate to me there superior legislative powers for the "working man"....except of course, for there taxes. Which I get homicidal over, if button pushed.
Neither party represents the American party any more. But we don't need to get off on that rabbit trail....
How could they acheive that kind of money if they don't work the line for a major airline?
 
Depends on how fast TUL decides to work... and no, I don't have the fully loaded cost-outs for AA or the TIMCO proposal.

Just guessing, at 22 days, it's probably cheaper to in-source.

If it takes 28-30 days (which is what I've been hearing), then the cost of TIMCO's 35 day turn is probably less.

And, if for some reason TIMCO winds up taking 40 days, (other than perhaps something like unexpected structural damage or excessive corrosion?) AA doesn't pay the overage.

Right now, AA's carrying the cost of those extra 6-8 days regardless of the cause.
How do you know what Timco charges ? Plus you throw in the bit about if it runs into extra days that Timco doesn't charge, well I doubt that's true. When I worked at AAR there was no set price for a repair, it depended on how many hours get put into it. Such a policy where they eat any delay would encourage them to not do the job right.

The fact is we will never see exactly how much TIMCO charges nor what it costs AA and even if we did every check is different because different things are found during the course of the check, no two are exactly alike.
 
How could they acheive that kind of money if they don't work the line for a major airline?

Buck, because:
A.) Boeing is a healthy, profitable Co(787 has been a MAJOR drain on cash though)
B.) There aren't near the number of line mechs at Boeing that an airline employs.(or vs factory emp....Boeing could easily afford that rate)

Again...moot point. Never happen with the IAM.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top