Again, if the CEO of AA doesn't even know if it's cheaper to outsource, how can you know? We may get a ballpark estimate with the limited Timco contract, although they may initially choose to "break even" in order to get future work. Only a protracted relationship would be accurate. AA has the most extensive maintenance capabilities under one roof than any other facility in the world and is staffed with trained personnel. Your right, it's financially impractical for AA to do their own maintenance as the amount of waste from mismanagement, union interference, and low morale is staggering. An efficiently ran facility of this caliber would be priceless to any airline as outsourcing removes most of the control an airline has to maintain tight turn times, quality, and extended contract costs.
True as long as efficiently run equates to being able to turn an aircraft as cost effective as Timco. We have probably the top maintenance facility anywhere but it's not cost effective. We have now 757's being outsourced while our trained personal are fishing on the weekends. AA has no leadership and we all know that. ORD is a prime example of that. Nobody want to be responsible or hold anybody accountable for ANYTHING they do or don't do. 4-10's here have never worked. As all it means is hey I get to sleep for 2 more hours. Station Management wont change that because they don't want anybody upset! I'm getting off track, sorry but it's line also with no leadership.
Reminds me of the scene in "Dancing With Wolves" when the union army is pinned down by an inferior rebel force, the brass watching from a hilltop without a clue how to gain a tactical advantage. Likewise, AA is devoid of the leadership skills to overcome this obstacle.