- Aug 20, 2002
- 7,319
- 1,555
No you missed the point, maybe I was not clear. When I spoke of TULSA I was referring to the City of Tulsa/State of Oklahoma and their attempts to maintain a workforce of over 5000.I think you're missing the point here.....Tulsa gave the company an excuse to try an MRO, and if it turns out that TIMCO does a fairly good job and it saves the company money, more and more aircraft will go to TIMCO, at least in the near term.
Devastating as a closure maybe, the LINE nor TUL are RED CIRCLED. There would be a lot of churn. The point being that unless the TWU has a secret letter of agreement with Tulsa, DFW and or AFW, no one will be protected. I believe that in the last T/A that there was language to protect from a takeover, but not divestiture. As for an increase in further farming out, I am sure that we have protection for that.