Checking it Out said:
The truth is the last 20% is the hardest to achieve, especially since amfa has been here before. I suspect the card count will fall short. The members are educated and know full well if amfa were to get in, the bottom 35% will be laid off and the rest, the company will do with as they please.
CIO, I find your math very interesting. I agree we do need 20% more cards signed to ask the NMB for a vote. It could also be said we need 10% more of the membership to sign cards but, your figure is enlightening and I will try to use your math so you can understand it better.
The 17.5% cash, plus other concessions of vacation time, holidays, sick time, work rules ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect........................., comes to about 30%.
Using your math we need a 60% pay and benefit increase to get back to where we were before our Industry Leading Concessions.
TWU-ILC = Industry Leading Concessions.
AMFA-ILC = Industry Leading Contract.
As you can see the begging letters are different as they are with totally different concepts of contracts.
TWU"S 30% concessions = 60% increase to recover.
AMFA's 0% concessions = 0% increase to recover.
As you can see the numbers are totally different. I hope this helps clear things up for you!!!
Although as employees, we have put the company on corporate welfare, which we can be very proud of, at NW management has had to take the brunt of the situation with payouts and downsizing of management. NW has rapidly changed their business model to become profitable. AA has rapidly changed its Union model to become profitable.
NW has farmed out work against its labor contracts.
AA has in-house farmed out work with approval of its labor contracts.
According to the TWU's Informer, there is a 10 cent pay (pennies) difference between UAL's pay and AA's pay (working at a base) of course this is not including the Vacation time, Holiday pay, Sick Time, Work rules ect ect ect ect ect ect............ that the Informer conveniently left out.
CIO, All of this does not include cost of living increases. My question is this, will it be hard (staying with the TWU's give everything policy) to recover the 60% we need to get back to a place where we can be in the hole from the cost of living increases to catch up to NW and or UAL?
Also would it be better to force the company to change its business model, or is it better to keep the company on its employee funded corporate welfare?
Also is it better to vote for our Union president and other international officers, or is it better for them to be appointed by the elitists?
If it is better to keep the company funded with labor concessions, so the company knows they can get welfare from its employees? If yes, then where is the incentive for the company to change its business model??? If the company knows the threat of bankruptcy will bend the union over in less than an hour (more simply put: If the company gets hard up they can roll over and stick it in, at their pleasure), how many hours will it take to get a check from its employees?
I do realize that last question is an unethical one but, I just can't find better words for it!!! Sorry
We need a stronger BARGINING AGENT.