nevergiveup
Veteran
- Nov 30, 2010
- 2,125
- 2,148
Speculative at best!I think they've made it quite obvious: to get rid of USAPA.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Speculative at best!I think they've made it quite obvious: to get rid of USAPA.
A fence that would allow you to keep Phoenix all for yourself!When you say isn't there something that could make it better than the Nicolau. What? Judge Silverasked that question about something in the contract. Would you be willing to accept a b scale? Give the west more than the east? No, a union can't have different benefits for different members. Plus we now have a contract.
So what could the east (minority) now offer the west to back something other than the Nicolau equal or better than the Nicolau?
I fully understand how there are younger guys in more senior positions on the LCC arbitrated list than you feel is fair.
I fully understand that due to an evolving industry, this type of evolution is possible.
I fully understand that there are new hires at LCC and the same will likely occur with our "tail end Charlies".
I fully understand that relative "slotting" may place younger pilots with less LOS in positions on the combined list in such a way that they are senior to AA pilots with more LOS.
I fully understand that some people are hung up on age when it has absolutely nothing to do with combining seniority lists.
In 2020, a time frame you chose, AA pilot retirements will accelerate and exceed LCC retirement numbers.. (A likely time any fence will be down, unless it is by named pilot, -which I would like to see-) and the LCC pilots will be enjoying far greater access to widebody, current, AA jobs.
I'm not sure why you're trying to change the color of the sky. I may not think like the other AA pilots you've met, but to try and bring age into this is a slippery, (irrelevant) slope.
That is not goi g to happen. Just like there is not going to be a fence that keeps CLT PHL and DCA all to yourself. There have been mergers. Deal with it.A fence that would allow you to keep Phoenix all for yourself!
So the MOU trumps the RLA? HA!! There's no status quo because the MOU says so? That's hysterical. See you in court soon. Think about that LUP btw. Can't wait to force feed the BPR the Nic to hand over to the APA via court order.
The point was however the list is organized in the coming merger, if the NIC is used as the airways list the APA pilots will be slotting in with very senior widebody, and narrowbody captains, most in their late 50's early 60's as well as AWA guys that were hired in 96-2000 etc and are in their early to mid forties. In the NIC list a guy hired in 98 at AWA would be senior to a guy hired in 86 on the east...neither pilot ever furloughed. So that is where my "mid 80's' number came from. not talking about DOH, but talking about reletive slotting. And as i earlier said, we have guys hired in 81 junior to people whose airline didnt even exist at that time per the NIC
Call it reletive seniority, slotting whatever the method, the end result will be older APA guys slotted under much younger AWA guys. The extra widebodies AA has will only protect so many APA guys before they start seeing the late 90's AWA hires mixed in with them.
By 2020, 7 years from now, 1500+ of the 3400 east pilots will be retired, only about 65 or so of the 1600 west pilots will be gone by then.
That was why I questioned your stance. AA like the east is an older pilot group, not as old and the east guys are, but old enough to never make up the difference of being placed under folks hired in the late 90's. Some who have not hit their 40th birthday yet. Your stance seemed to not be in line with every other APA pilot I have talked to. Contrary to westie belief we east pilots do have many friends that are AA pilots.
So in your world because you don't think someone should hold office even though the MAJORITY voted for him he should not have gotten in.Just opened the Phl vice chair runoff election email from GH.
What a political scam he must be attempting by having the runoff by Taylor & Dubarry.
Guess he figures he can just bypass the majority will among Phl rank & file.
What a piece of work!
He should have NEVER got in office and I am embarrassed for those who voted for him
Once again " something rotten in denmark "
FA
I think they've made it quite obvious: to get rid of USAPA.
Minority or majority? 6-5 sounds like a majority to me.Not an insider so I can only speculate.
Reckon an answer will surface soon.
My bet it will be some loophole that the GH clan is using to maintain their MINORITY based BPR rank / file vote control.
FA
Dave,
Wish you were my rep so I could personally call you out on this oh so typical arrogant leadership role you so easily perpetuate.
A reps job should be one of humbleness to share info.
Not insult with " gramps / trifocals / angry FO etc " .
This was released at 3:57pm today Friday. I read this short time ago.
So my experience says it unlikely to get an answer from enuf trusted sources at this hour to ascertain a potential " truth " on the matter.
Therefore I chose to sound the siren on this Webb board to possibly hear from an informed source.
Btw......in no way shape or form would I ever entertain your words to me as anything other than divisive. Recall the aol main goal of destroying my union.
Did just speak with a soon to be rep and he confirmed " politics as usual " w/o further explanation as time did not permit for either of us.
Thx however for posting above. I'll take it with a grain of salt .
FA
You're kidding right? Expediting the death of your fake scab union is obviously a priority.Speculative at best!
Minority or majority? 6-5 sounds like a majority to me.
BTW Gary Hummel won by a majority of votes did he not?
That west pilot hired in 1998 is a captain. That east pilot hired in 86 is an F/ O. There is only a 5 year average difference between the east and west. So your fears are unfounded.
So what that AWA was started in 1881? That is why we have a SENIORITY integration not a Los integration. I have not seen age as a criteria for SENIORITY integration. Can you quote an arbitrated list where that has happened?
Now for your big lie.
You say that in the next 7 years 50% of the east will retire while only 65 west pilots will retire in the next 7 years. Completely untrue. If you are going to make something up at least try and make it believable.
Relative integration makes sense. If you are 30% on the Nicolau list and end up 28-32% on the combined new American list. How were you harmed or what changed in your SENIORITY? Fences for the wide bodies. Done.
A guy at the bottom of the list should expect to remain at the bottom of the list. Not like the usapa method that a furloughed pilot should be senior to a west captain.
got anything new? You benefit by relative position. Perhaps it's all about you.That west pilot hired in 1998 is a captain. That east pilot hired in 86 is an F/ O. There is only a 5 year average difference between the east and west. So your fears are unfounded.
So what that AWA was started in 1881? That is why we have a SENIORITY integration not a Los integration. I have not seen age as a criteria for SENIORITY integration. Can you quote an arbitrated list where that has happened?
Now for your big lie.
You say that in the next 7 years 50% of the east will retire while only 65 west pilots will retire in the next 7 years. Completely untrue. If you are going to make something up at least try and make it believable.
Relative integration makes sense. If you are 30% on the Nicolau list and end up 28-32% on the combined new American list. How were you harmed or what changed in your SENIORITY? Fences for the wide bodies. Done.
A guy at the bottom of the list should expect to remain at the bottom of the list. Not like the usapa method that a furloughed pilot should be senior to a west captain.