+1000
That goes for everyone in America's working class...
It's both.
No, but you certainly hold people in charge accountable.
All due respect, but when unions are structured to maximize engagement amongst the members, guys like Nelson don't have a voice. The fact that he gets so much traction w/r/t DL 141 says a lot where you guys are at vs. where you need to be as a group.
This seems like a rationale for giving up and settling for whatever may come...
One of the beauties of elected leadership is the ability to change them out when they're not meeting the needs/wants of the membership.
That's true. It's about the wants and needs of the membership. It hasn't been a lot of communication between the District. Just a lot of dissention; apathy; and negativity since we came into the IAM. The district should have first welcomed the new members from sCO into the union, and tried to work with our issues and concerns. That didn't happen. Of course there was a bitter campaign between the IAM and the IBT, but we felt we had to go union (with the IBT) just because of this merger, and we had a hasty contract. But the issue was the negotiators was going to use the old UA contract as a baseline, not our IBT contract and the non union FTW. That didn't happen. (BTW: what is "interest based negotiations?") Then you have Upstairs (sCO Passenger Services) who aren't even fully dues paying members yet who are in limbo. The're concerns and issues aren't even met. And the District should have known this because you have four distinct groups working against each other: IAM members from sUA who want what was taken from them; a loyal die hard group of IBT supporters from our side who felt and knew that the IAM would not fight for our issues, ie: Cargo. And there are card drives going on right now.; Anti unionists who want no part of any union, and liked things the way they were (the dues structure doesn't help either. That's just my own opinion); and the apathetic who just want to do their jobs and have a distaste for all of the politics, and would not vote if their life depended on it. IMHO, these forces have to have to be dealt with in some sort of fashion. You can't blame Tim for pointing these things out. This TA was not going to pass because of people felt things would be worse later on down the line in 2016. What makes you think that the IAM could fight in 2016?
Bottom line is the District should have known about this and tried to work with all parties, instead of just surveys that they did not heed. We want SCOPE. We want MEDICAL. We want sUA to get some form or all of their retro which is due. (and sCO a signing bonus)
There has to be a change in this District.