Aww..Nuts!! All our "delusions" busted once again...sigh. OK. I'm curious sir: How's it actually going to go in the end? I'm tired of constantly struggling with painfull delusions and being so entirely unrealistic, so...just tell us what will happen...please? It's terrible living in this confused state of mind, and I just want to know!! Alpa clearly has the judge right in their pocket...and...I, well...I do know that it's totally hopeless. Just kindly put our delusions and all of us out of our sad misery and tell us what will actually happen. :blink: It's obvious that you know...so please be kind and tell us all.
What are the true FACTS here? I mean other than "You won't even get 200 cards!!" and those sorts of "facts" of course
Seriously; I woudn't ever dream of questioning your credibility..so just tell us the outcome.
From the presiding Judge:
""It is also difficult to understand defendants' causation argument that, even if plaintiffs had been designated as active on the seniority list submitted to the arbitrator, their positions on the integrated list would not have been affected. In the Award, the arbitrator made clear that the integrated list merged active US Airways pilots with active America West pilots, but that 'merging active pilots with furloughees, despite the length of service of some of the latter, is not at all fair or equitable under any of the stated criteria.' . . .
"Accepting [plaintiffs'] allegations as true, and reading the Proposed Supplemental Complaint in the manner most favorable to plaintiffs, plaintiff have adequately alleged that their injuries were caused by the defendants' knowing stipulation to introduce an erroneous seniority list that they knew would adversely affect the careers and employment rights of their represented members. Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint is therefore granted."
Yessir! Alpa's clearly got 'em on the run there. I do see your point.
"The Amended Complaint makes clear that plaintiffs knew or reasonably should have known as early as the execution of the 2002 LOA, and no later than the 2004 LOA, that defendants had misrepresented MidAtlantic's corporate form to them and bargained away their rights under the CBA. "
"While plaintiffs did not know definitively whether MidAtlantic was a division -- as the agreement only provided that US Airways 'may' operate MidAtlantic as such -- they knew or reasonably should have known that defendants had rendered what plaintiffs claim was an important bargaining factor into an irrelevant one."
Well..you know?..You're right. It's not over by any means, and the proceedings, against Alpa's/any defendant's normal request for dismissal, will continue. What's most distressing is that I do see that the Court's extremely sympathetic to Alpa in every respect thus far. Sigh..It's a hopelessly lost cause...darn!!
Parting question sir: Do you guys actually have any out there who's vast lexicon of verbally abusive material palpably exceeds the established boundaries of quintessential subtlety via; "you clowns"?..."sheep"?/etc..(little future progress to be made with Goats I'd think)....just curious. In full fairness,...one wonders. "Treat us lahk professhunuls..we're not f--kin' stooopid" For the most part, that, and equally insightfull soundbites from PHX, coupled with the collective postings throughout these threads are all we mainly have to judge from.
