Jim,Yes they did - and the minimum "cash" requirements were lowered twice - shortly after US entered BK2 and again in early 2005 (Jan I think, although it may have been Feb before the court approved the modification). Without the ATSB's two agreements to lower those minimums, US would have violated the covenants twice. One of the "what if's" I always wondered about was whether the ATSB could have actually called the loan since US was in BK and the ATSB-backed loan was a pre-BK debt. Of course, just entering BK2 violated the loan covenants so that may be a clue to the answer....
However, those minimum "cash" requirements didn't result in that amount becoming classified as restricted "cash". The "cash collateral", as it was called, was a part of the unrestricted "cash" number in the earlier post. So while US had the ~$550+ million or ~$400 million in "cash", most of it wasn't spendable if the ATSB requirements were to be met.
Jim
Since you're good at it, and I'm lazy, how much cash did each company have in the bank on the day the merger was closed. The ATSB loans were paid off, and the loan restrictions were gone then right? Just wondering how much cash the two companies brought to the table.
I keep hearing that AWA was paying the payroll for the east just before the merger closed, you know if that is true, or how to find out?