ableoneable
Veteran
- May 6, 2007
- 711
- 0
Let the whipsawing begin.
Allen Hemenway, V.P. Labor relations, sent a letter to both MECs outlining the company's thoughts on the China airplanes.
"...the Company expressed our view that, because these aircraft were not on order by US or HP at the time of Transition Agreement and because they are not in excess of the number identified for that airline in Attachment B to the Transision Agreement (II-B-5), these aircraft can be placed into service by the Company as either East or West replacement.
Of course, if A330-200 aircraft are introduced at West, the Company would be under the obligation to negotiate with West ALPA over rates for that aircraft type, and we envision that those negotiations would be with West only. This is not an issue on the East, because the aircraft is not 'new equipment' under the East agreement."
I am sure this letter is available via the ALPA site. I have it via an e-mail attachment and can't post it.
Allen Hemenway, V.P. Labor relations, sent a letter to both MECs outlining the company's thoughts on the China airplanes.
"...the Company expressed our view that, because these aircraft were not on order by US or HP at the time of Transition Agreement and because they are not in excess of the number identified for that airline in Attachment B to the Transision Agreement (II-B-5), these aircraft can be placed into service by the Company as either East or West replacement.
Of course, if A330-200 aircraft are introduced at West, the Company would be under the obligation to negotiate with West ALPA over rates for that aircraft type, and we envision that those negotiations would be with West only. This is not an issue on the East, because the aircraft is not 'new equipment' under the East agreement."
I am sure this letter is available via the ALPA site. I have it via an e-mail attachment and can't post it.