Bob,
So your response is basically I refuse to enforce the contract and you can't make me. Don't like it? File a DFR. And you how loose the language is for a DFR? Even incompetence is protected activity under the DFR provisions. Only discriminatory or intentionally harmful activity is a DFR. Since you truly believe, wrongly, that the language allows this work to be outsourced then it isn't a DFR.
And saying it's OH work shows your true colors. You never carried about OH jobs because you see them as a drag on your line pay. Also the OH claim and loophole you bring up is BS. I spoke with Mosblech, he said the AA busses are going to the US phased MX program so the work is going to be line. So you are not defending AA work that is in our scope line or base.
Again this is a 29d presidential grievance, one of your fellow officers isn't doing his job, compel him with a motion. Me file a motion? Time limits will have killed the grievance by then. Don't you know the contract? You sure know how to make motions and have special board meetings if it affects you directly.
Rojas and Knapp, time for a new direction at 591. Hatfield, Glen in MIA, or Kilbane would be great candidates as Tresurers. Even though Kilbane is an AMFA guy he has great character and ethics. When the 2094 drive was going forward he came forward and resigned his position. Unlike you and many of your 591 officers who advocate for other unions at AA. You allow the use of TWU funds to sue the Int'l. What? That's like your own family member writing checks on your account to sue you because the want the right to have a new family that will give them more stuff. How the Int'l allows that blows me away. Yes we all have the right to speak up and should but not allow the destruction of jobs, not even try to enforce language you don't like, or use dues money for other than what benefits the membership.