Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
Could you provide a bit more background on that statement?delldude said:there are rumors of several airbuses in the desert...let it be known,they have been overhauled....however...your union has verbage that these aircraft cannot be returned to USAIRWAYS service unless they have been inducted for service with another airline and sent back to the desert.
if these are planes that were overhauled after being returned to lessor's in BK,then we now have a new dilema and a new challange.the union will not take this lightly..Chip Munn said:My comments on this issue were to provide information, period. To suggest otherwise is simply wrong and likely an emotional versus logical thought process.
I was the first one on this website who let IAM members know the A320 family aircraft outsourcing plan was on the horizon, only to be criticized by Lavman and others. Then the attempt to contract the "S" checks happened.
Was it better to know the outsourcing attack was about to occur, so the IAM legal staff could prepare for the battle, or would it have been better to be surprised?
Now, is it better to know information about 2 A319s being returned from the desert to meet the 279 fleet count, while 2 A319s sit in Alabama or not?
Moreover, is it better for readers know information about the appeal process or not?
Regards,
Chip