Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh please, save the sensitivity. There is just as much hanky panky today between pilots and flight attendants as in the 70's and 80's. Hell everyone is popping a viagra along with their arthritis pill. I hear enough and see enough on van rides to the hotel that make me wanna puke. You honestly think that those dating or married to a pilot will vote to split from them? AAAAAHAHAHAHA It's real and happening everyday. Couple all of that with f/a's that STILL......yes STILL don't know when they are going to go illegal. Many of our f/a's couldn't find their own rear or make it out of the airport without the pilots.
Really...sensitivity has nothing to do with it. It's just silly to state that the flight attendants wouldn't vote on a split because they are all having affairs with pilots.Oh please, save the sensitivity. There is just as much hanky panky today between pilots and flight attendants as in the 70's and 80's. Hell everyone is popping a viagra along with their arthritis pill. I hear enough and see enough on van rides to the hotel that make me wanna puke. You honestly think that those dating or married to a pilot will vote to split from them? AAAAAHAHAHAHA It's real and happening everyday. Couple all of that with f/a's that STILL......yes STILL don't know when they are going to go illegal. Many of our f/a's couldn't find their own rear or make it out of the airport without the pilots.
So I have heard from many people including the V.P of operations and Planning Brad Beakly that Hector Adler wants to create designated Cabin Service Director (C.S.D) position for our international flights coming this summer. Similar to what other airlines have .CO calls it the International Service Manager(I.S.M) .DL and AA call it the Purser position. It will be a separate bid position . Just want to know what everyones thoughts were on this. I personally think its a great move as it brings about consistency to our intl product and I welcome it . If (and is a big IF) They do it right with qualified F/a's then I think it will be succesfull.
Really...sensitivity has nothing to do with it. It's just silly to state that the flight attendants wouldn't vote on a split because they are all having affairs with pilots.
I never said ALL, and I'm done splitting hairs about this, but ask yourself this. Do you honestly think the flight attendants who ARE would bid to split?
*wait for it... wait for it*
The union is only as strong as it's weakest member. MANY are fed up with local 70 BUT won't band together to do something about it. I haven't seen such a G'damn joke of an office since.........well never actually. Hey they answer phones though. So do operators at AT&T. Look, we can't get f/a's to band together on a true issue so don't look for them to hold their "elected" officials accountable. I find whining and complaining or every f/a calling the union daily won't change things. Think management here. You can tell them something doesn't work over and over and over yet they will think of themselves as God like and continue about their business. Ya see the f/a's have busy lives and have no time to oust the Ringling Bros. circus we call a union. JM believes himself to be THE best that there is. I'm going to ask this of any possible supporters on here. WHAT on God's green earth has the local done for you? Got a claim filed? Adjusted your time or had a sick call knocked off? C'mon I mean really. That's standard union business on a SLOW day. What difference are they making? Holy hell it's a joke.
I believe there are plenty of other reasons to vote no on a split from the pilots other than one's affairs.I never said ALL, and I'm done splitting hairs about this, but ask yourself this. Do you honestly think the flight attendants who ARE would bid to split?
*wait for it... wait for it*
My opinion with regards to the CSD "program"...
The only way this should ever be considered by the AFA is if it is a position in addition to the current crew complement, otherwise it is taking away yet another position from the AFA membership, thus violating our seniority.
If the Company agrees to add a CSD position above and beyond the crew complement (which they won't, $$$....), it should then be interviewed for by a panel consisting of peers, elected AFA leaders, and the Company.
Why even consider a system that is straight seniority driven? If it is straight seniority driven, the same senior people will obviously bid it, messes and all (not saying all senior people are messes, relax, just that this will not solve the current problem of incompetent senior CSD's, and we know they're out there...).
Haven't we lost enough positions throughout the years already, without losing another biddable positon? Sheesh. If the Company does not agree to an additional position, bag the idea. Period. Protect what little is left of our seniority/ positions at the Incredible Shrinking Airline.
Now, back to squabbling about pilot/ FA affairs. Isn't it time for another argument about trash bags?
Better write Flores, Austin and your LEC officers. They don't see the need for it to be an ADD position. I don't want to even see it on my dining room table if it's a position loss. Save the paper.
In ring #5 Ladies and Gentleman the votes for AFA 66 recall will be counted tomorrow. Place your bets!