I thought Mike was the head or I guess team leader of the JNC for the east. And he's the one who communicates for the JNC east. It's crickets from everyone lately - I understand some information is fairly sensitive, but, speaking from the East perspective, we have gotten more info regarding contract negotiation updates from Lisa LeCarre and Council 66's E-lines - and often the information that is disseminated to us is different than what's being put out there. I have never EVER seen anything from Carol regarding our negotiations. My personal opinion is she should be at EVERY LEC meeting where the membership is present. She was invited to Council 70's meeting in March and didn't come. Give me a break.
I know she's on the team but how can you hold her responsible the slow progress of the negotiations? It's the company that's been dragging their feet.
I'm not blaming her for the slow progress, I'm holding her (and the JNC) responsible for the pathetic proposals that are being passed back and forth - specifically the RSV section as highlighted on Council 66's E-line. It's being touted as being this wonderful improvement to what we have, and, from what I've read, it's no more than LTO with RAPS (which the West have) - Show me some improvements that both sides could benefit from. It's so one-sided it's a joke.
I'm playing devil's advocate here so don't pounce.
As for they're not being a rsv on the JNC, I not sure it's possible given the type of meeting schedule the JNC has. I wouldn't know if the MEC RSV chair is being included in proposals or not. Has she said she's been locked out of discussions?
And which rsv proposal is ridiculous? I know there are several that the company has agreed to that sounded decent to me. Like the RAPs.
Our MEC RSV chair has confidentiality agreements she must abide by, but I'm pretty sure if she was invited she would be there. She is a reserve, she walks in reserve shoes, and she is passionate and knowledgable for the cause of improving quality of life for all flight attendants, including reserves. The RSV proposal is ridiculous. Horrid. The RAPS are an improvement but the West currently has that. Again, show me some specific wonderous quality-of-life, improvements in this section. They aren't there.
And who's stonewalling you?
Many of us feel that we have gotten the brush off for years. At the March meeting in PHL many people united and made motions, seconded motions, and passed motions. For example, we have been begging for an A-day system that provides some sort of relief or build up line for reserves for years. For years we were told, "the blockholders will never go for that." After being stonewalled on this issue for so long, motions were made and passed. Thankfully when it went to the MEC in Vegas the motion among the LECP's was passed. (Thank you, LECP's) - Is it lip service? Is it just to placate us? I don't know, but I'm glad some things we motioned for were explored. That said, it seems with the INTL elections we weren't fairly represented as the way Council 70's membership voted to have John M vote was flat out ignored - in fact he went 100% the opposite way, casting the deciding votes for Veda and Sarah, instead of supporting our US candidates.
Just questions. Not trying to start an argument. 🙂