Tiger 1050
Veteran
- Aug 4, 2007
- 882
- 12
That analogy is a house of cards and falls apart as time moves forward. It's a snapshot and not dynamic and does not reflect any number of items.
The fact is that US Airways still exists is due to the huge sacrifices that it's pilot group made by way of pay cuts, work rules, pension termination, furloughs etc.
Only to survive long enough to see the AWA merger. Apart from your sacrifices would have you receiving more of what you had at best. You said it yourself(see above) that this was the standard for you guys at AAA prior to the merger... Attrition maybe. Furlough more likely and outright liquidation very probable.
Relative seniority does not account for these sacrifices, nor the fact that in the example you referenced that individual may be scheduled to retire in the top 100 or top 50 and will rapidly advance due purely to attrition. What you propose would transfer the time vested in his craft, benefits, and the payoff for his/her sacrifices to someone else over time beginning one day after the snapshot(relative seniority) integration.
You guys like to use the lottery example a lot. So let's use that as an analogy... When you buy a lottery ticket do you believe you should win every time? I mean c'mon you spent money on it! You've invested in the lottery! It should be required that it provides winnings for you, right? Fact is while your sacrifices were tremendous it did not guarantee anything. Even your job. You knew that then but you deny it now. This issue is dead. Nic will stand. We had equal opportunity to present our case to the arbitration board and Nic is what we get... The law will support the AWA position on this as well. USAPA or ALPA you will not over turn the Nic award.