E
EastUS
Guest
You do realise that the ALPA merger policy only applies when there are two pilot groups who are merging and both groups are ALPA, don't you? For a stapling to occur in that case, then it can only come at the hands of a professional arbitrator because when two ALPA pilot groups merge, they go to arbitration. Remove yourself from ALPA and merge with a much larger pilot group and then see what happens. You think you were mistreated by an arbitrator, well just wait and see what would happen when the larger pilot group cuts a deal with your CEO. Remember how "generous" the APA was with a different union? Suddenly an arbitrator wouldn't look so bad.
I fully trust Alpo to act solely in it's own best interests..and the line pilots be damned.
I'll note that I find Alpo "merger policy" to be a total joke, a rudderless ship, and splintered yardstick for any predictions regarding future mergers.
Consider the following possibility = LCC actually ends up as the acquiring entity, and isn't Alpa at the time of purchase. Would you guys/gals out west feel better or worse working to integrate a larger list of Alpa guys into the picture then? Don't mistake that question for any desire for other than DOH on my part.
Do you assume a virginal innocence and total lack of corruption within Alpo? Is there ANY reason to imagine that backdoor business isn't routinely conducted with managements by them? Why/how would anyone assume that any future merger would be free of such by having both "sides" Alpo?