EastUS1 said:See listings under The First Amendment for clarification if you need to. A "disgusting attack on the POTUS, stating he should be " taken out and hung" is therein covered methinks. Some/any directly expressed plan for doing such himself might constitute a "threat" on Anger's part, but not just nonsensical venting. You gentlemen are completely wrong in pursuing such nonsense. Anger's just an eternal teenager. He was merely letting off some "spartan" steam. He's every bit as much a "threat" to the POTUS or anyone else as is an average orange in the crisper drawer.
Addendum: We all properly laugh at the various "spartan" and "Larry Potta" videos. Since when has it suddenly become appropriate to treat mindlessly typed ravings with any more seriousness? 😉 Can anyone now honestly suggest that we take the following at all "seriously", as being any "threat"?...? If not; then I reasonably suggest that the same rules of engagement be applied elsewhere as well. Any desire to "get" the "other side" in NO way, shape or form justifies surrendering one's own principles. Let none of us now forget that for merely reasons of momentary convenience.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7lgU3J5seA&list=PL21C1C7D32B996827