Megasnoop
Veteran
Snoop, are you sure about that 2041 date? That is 12+ years after my retirement if I go to 65and I am very young among the West captains. Would not hurt us at all if hundreds go in front of us for the rest of our careers?
MY BAD. 2031. 2044 is your youngest gun (I got that right?). But you shouldnt ignore my point. Unless cooler heads prevail and you get control of your former MEC chairman and his ilk who continue to deny jumpseats, the hostilities will continue, at least until the UAL fragmentation. I will never understand the rather immature attacks that continue. This chat board being a microcosm, from my view, your crowd has it all over us in that regard.
You are lucky to fly with the top of the list, and I admire their support of the rest of your group, however, are these not the same people who will not be with us much longer because of this great attrition rate east is suppose to have?
Your correct. These will be the first to retire, starting in 2012, health issues aside. Almost all willing to vote against a NIC-contract. Heres some conjecture, one thing adding to their support is what some regard a windfall for them, an extra 5 years of CA pay. For me, that extra 5 year potential makes it easier for me to stay an IRO/FO for my entire career, so Im not upset on that. In fact, Im glad it happened when it did. Im not a "me-me-me - its all about me" kind of guy.
If the court discounts Nicolau, then the west will have to decide for themselves (I would never predict how it would play out) whether or not to accept a combined contract with less than the Nicolau list. Here again, if the east prevails in their LOA 93 grievance, they would be hard pressed (I conjecture here) to see the east pilots leap far ahead in pay. But stranger things have happened around here in the last few years.
Stranger things have happened. Where do we start? Still, we have the majority until +/-2016 when east retirements give west members control. The judge obviously plans on forcing us to negotiate with the NIC, but he cant force us to vote in favor of something the rank and file dont want. So lets wrap this up right now, get a Kirby-TA from the company, include Section 22 NIC, have the BPR support it and put it out for a vote. Theyd have to or be acting in bad faith. If nothing else, it will get us more paid-up members.
Short of a win in both the RJ and illegal line reduction arbitrations, furloughed plaintiffs Wargocki and Iranpour are not coming back any time soon. LCC furloughed them, not USAPA and neither USAPA or Wake can bring them back. How that plays out in court is immaterial. Theyre still furloughed. This trial isnt going to recall them. Parker said these furloughs will be for a long time, doing his best to reduce excess-capacity in the industry. I believe him.
Per the TA, the company wont allow a flush bid, nor furloughed pilots bumping active pilots, compensation for flying not performed, nor other conditions which materially increase their costs. Even if we win the arbitrations, those 2 come back to separate operations, still bottom of their list – a long time from now, according to the dougster. Lacking arbitration win, not sure what good a number is when your looking at 5+ years before you can use it.
I'm truly joyous that you find any of this hilarious. May your luck respond in kind. As far as the irony, I will reiterate for the UMPTEENTH time that USAPA never offered guarantees of ANYTHING other than the empowerment of the individual pilot who had at least a passing interest in participation.
Amen, brother. I voted for USAPA because ALPA left me long ago, starting with LOA93 and $750K in lost pension. One thing even Judge Wake hasnt factored in is the fragmentation of the west before the merger with UAL. So this entire exercise may turn out to be a colossal waste of time, energy and money. Mr Snoop