captainJack
Member
- Jul 16, 2009
- 91
- 0
Which set of books? Just the ones the SEC sees?..... basically we were given access to the companies books and other information.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which set of books? Just the ones the SEC sees?..... basically we were given access to the companies books and other information.
Sigh. As explained many times, the company must accept a list presented by a CBA. They have no choice. Whether the list "accepted" gets used, replaced or modified is subject to many things.And that's why USAPA lost the DFR.
There was already a list and the company backs that 100%.
There was a "proposed" list, subject to two diametrically opposed groups individual ratification. "proposed" in the sense that it had no legs until a merged contract was accepted by both groups. It was absolutely not a "merged" list. Since that was not going to happen, with separate operations forever looming, and knowing how management loves to whipsaw labor groups (it takes longevity to experience that), USAPA was formed as a best chance at a merged list.There already was a merged list before USAPA was formed.
Doing stuff requires you to stay focused on doing stuff, not merely trying in vain to prove that you're legitimate by bullying your fellow pilots.
And if you take the whole of ALPA's contribution, it was far more positive than you give it credit for.
If you look at the whole of USAPA's contribution, waddya got? :down:
Sigh. As explained many times, the company must accept a list presented by a CBA. They have no choice. Whether the list "accepted" gets used, replaced or modified is subject to many things.
and,
that is not why the kangaroo court ruled for AOL.
Or maybe he's tired of being represented by people who are mentally and ethically challenged and wants to do something about it.
Or maybe he has his eyes set on something for himself, and he will flip/flop position at will, to befriend whomever may help him at the moment, slicing their throat the next.
Your side is welcoming him with open arms, as he espouses his rhetoric of coming together to get a contract etc etc. Do us a favor, if there is a split up, why not take him with you?!?!?!? Please???? There are many no fly lists that would empty again.....
There you have it. Our US Federal court is now a 'kangaroo' court. I guess that means the 9th Circuit will also receive the same moniker. Do I hear the US Supreme Court too?that is not why the kangaroo court ruled for AOL.
Spin it / twist it however you want to; it doesn't really matter. Most people can see through this type of smokescreen by now.There was a "proposed" list, subject to two diametrically opposed groups individual ratification. "proposed" in the sense that it had no legs until a merged contract was accepted by both groups. It was absolutely not a "merged" list. Since that was not going to happen, with separate operations forever looming, and knowing how management loves to whipsaw labor groups (it takes longevity to experience that), USAPA was formed as a best chance at a merged list.
Just like the birthers are convinced Obama is from Kenya, so are the USAPAians convinced they actually have a prayer of undoing Nicolau. Good luck with both.
I actually believe this.
So, technically, it is being used already.
There you have it. Our US Federal court is now a 'kangaroo' court. I guess that means the 9th Circuit will also receive the same moniker. Do I hear the US Supreme Court too?
July 31, 2009
Dear President Cleary and BPR Members,
I have been a member in good standings of USAPA since July 2008. I have participated as an advisor to USAPA’s R & I Committee, Negotiating Committee, and your Benefit’s Specialist. Because there are a number of individuals in new leadership positions that resented my participation and felt threatened by my active involvement, I chose to help quietly behind the scenes trying to keep the company from taking advantage of our pilots and make the benefits transition a smooth one.
But it’s now time for me to step forward and say enough is enough. For over a year I have heard promise after promise, but none have come true. No contract in three months, no date of hire seniority list, and extensive abuse of union flight pay loss, instead of more volunteers giving of their time. You promised lower dues and a better accounting of every dollar spent, yet you refuse to share a budget, account for my 2008 contributions and can’t accurately calculate my future dues payments. You promised transparency and an organization based on democratic principles, yet you vote behind closed doors and give yourselves pay raises knowing you have deceitfully prevented any recall actions from being proffered. You are spending over 60% of all dues collected on legal counsel and waist money on outside pension and benefit’s advisors that are doing nothing positive for our pilots. You’re making promises you know you can’t keep and writing checks that we as members can’t afford!
Finally, your true controlling intensions became clear when you asked all pilots to support, with an assessment, an investigation of our pension termination. In this very emotional vote, you chose to present only one side of the story which influenced the outcome. I, along with other members of the previous R & I Committee offered to write a differing view that would have given all pilots the entire story before they committed to this waste of hard earned money. USAPA refused to publish our side of the story.
This social experiment called USAPA is not what I or other honest pilot at this airline wanted from our new union. We asked for fair representation that respected the needs and wants of everyone. We asked for leadership that practiced and encouraged democratic principles and didn’t take advantage of their power positions. We asked for leaders that put the line pilot first. The sad part is we have some real talented individuals in our group that USAPA refuses to recognize or use, with years of experience and expert advice. Unfortunately your egos get in the way of your common sense.
I only have to ask myself “Am I better off today then I was two years ago?†Fact is I’m not!
Things are actually worse now than they have ever been. The company gives USAPA leadership no respect or credibility. That has lead to real pain and suffering by many pilots and their families. That wouldn’t have happened under the previous bargaining agent. It only gets worse as times goes by. How much pain will we all have to endure before others finally join me in saying it’s time for a change. Unfortunately no matter what name we give this pilot organization (USAPA, ALPA, Teamsters, Etc.); we are still the same apathetic group that has allowed a hijacking of our union and the stagnation of our careers.
Fact is USAPA and its leadership have lost touch with the needs of our pilots! So because of misleading promises and lies, because of deceitful practices, mismanagement of dues and because my membership has been ignored and disrespected, I have decided to become an objector. I ask that my dues be re-evaluated immediately to reflect my change in membership status. I await your confirmation and reply!
Sincerely,
Rich Alter
USAPA #12288
704-XXX-XXXX
CC: US Airways Pilots
A more mature person would read that as the process that warrants the moniker, "kangaroo court". A less mature would take it as an attack. Any legal process that narrowly defines evidence in order to guarantee a desired outcome is a kangaroo court, by definition.There you have it. Our US Federal court is now a 'kangaroo' court. I guess that means the 9th Circuit will also receive the same moniker. Do I hear the US Supreme Court too?