cleardirect
Veteran
- May 24, 2008
- 6,234
- 9,749
- Banned
- #31
sharktooth
The moral high ground is held by those with integrity. Binding arbitration is but a piece of negotiation, something that can change when the players change. There is a consequence to not paying dues just as there is one for harassing "brother pilots", termination. USAPA published two opposing points of view. I agree, they should not have published O'Neill's lies.
Please denote when you are talking about, announcement of "merger", ceremonious "merger", or just whenever you decide to hack the clock?
Despite that, MDA was part of US. Sorry to say the "list", as presented to the "nic", was wrong.
I have always found that in business, many opportunities to lie present themselves. In my observations, those lying generally lose. In your case, your "reps" knew that the east list was a lie. They laid low and will now pay the penalties.
Shark,
You accused a man of lying in an article published in a newspaper. That is what I am asking you to prove or withdraw your accusation.
This has nothing to do with time or merger or PID or anything else. Once again I will post some of the comments that were made. If there is anything else in the article that you can prove is a lie please present the evidence.
At the time of the merger, 1,751 of the 5,000 East-based US Airways pilots were laid off.
So, when the arbitrator came back with a decision that provided US Airways' Eastern pilots with the 517 most senior spots on the integrated seniority list,
The middle spots were a ratio of pilots from both airlines, based upon a formula that the arbitrator and two neutral pilots from other airlines felt best represented fairness for all.
Date-of-hire seniority puts the majority of the former America West pilots at the bottom of the list, even below those who were unemployed when the merger took place.