cactusboy53
Veteran
- May 9, 2007
- 2,649
- 7,407
C53 reply
I'll start by apologizing for rehashing old material if that is the case. Truthfully, I rarely lurk anymore. Perhaps if new events transpire my attendance will improve. That said, I have a hypothetical to pose. Let's say (by some wild turn of events) that a TA is reached with DOH that is so spectacular (remember that I said hypothetical) that 90% of all pilots (west and east) vote for it. Question: will a DFR be successful?
Do you believe that a judge would grant an injunction against such an overwhelmingly popular TA? If we agreed to binding arbitration, would this not constitute tacit acceptance of DOH? Just curious, not trolling.
DFR successful? Who knows? DFR filed...Absolutely. DFR I was deliberated in 90 (or less). The only reason that it didn't move further is because the 9th punted (weakly, I might add) with the claim (2-1) that it wasn't quite ripe YET.
Granting an injunction? Who knows? Seeking an injunction....Absolutely. Any TA with DOH in it will garner nearly all East votes, and I would venture a guess of less than 5% of the West votes (just a guess, don't get excited). Frankly I can't see a TA of any "spectacular" proportions (we would have to move as a whole group to get Doug to cave to the Kirby Proposal + the 7-8% additional testified in the Addington trial) happening.
I'm not sure what you are referring to regarding the "binding arbitration"...and "acceptance of DOH". We as a group agreed to binding arbitration when it came to merging seniority lists. USAPA agreed to binding arbitration with the company on the LOA93 outcome (What happens if you win LOA93? Parker balks and refuses to pay...what then?). We as a group agreed to binding arbitration as it pertains to the E190 pilot staffing and the three B757's that LCC got from ATA (wow...that seems like a long time ago, doesn't it?).
DOH is DOA. It may take 20+ years, but it will be the Nicolau list. Thanks for the questions.