I guess they will disregard their own dicta when this winds up in front of them again. LMAO
NICDOA
NPJB
Addington is over, it ended with the denial from the SCOTUS of the writ. Therefore Addington will never wind up in front of the 9th again.
If you mean that if the company's DJ ends up in front of the 9th, the 9th will reference Addington, you are probably correct. They will point to Addington and tell LCC it needs to look no further than its own backyard for its answere.
The West pilot class sued usapa and LCC in Addington. LCC was released from the suit because it had to that point complied with its obligations. LCC had accepted the Nic, and did not entertain usapa's DOH proposal.
Now LCC finds itself in a precarious position. Join usapa in its DOH seniority theft scandal, and put skin into the game, knowing full well from the 9ths dicta in Addington, that once ratified into a contract they are irrevocably join at the hip with usapa in a case that took the jury the most minimum of time to reach a guilty verdict.
To sum, the 9th will not disregard its own dicta if a relevant topic is in front of them again. They will point to Addington, and say, there is your answere right there LCC, collude with usapa and get their DOH plan into a ratified contract, and you along with usapa will understand what we meant by the
"pain of an unquestionably ripe DFR".