US Pilots Labor Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
The 9th did not rule on the merits of the case, they ruled it wasnt ripe yet. Big difference.

Guess you missed that day in law school?

Answer the question with facts.
 
If it's an internal union dispute why is the company involved? Idiot.


Have you missed the multiple "crew news" in PHX where Doug repeatedly said they don't care what seniority method is used? Many of the West pilots have been screaming at Doug to take a leadership role but he keeps promising that the company has no part in it and is impartial about the whole situation. If the company is so involved, why are pilots resorting to wearing raincoats indoors? (Hmm.. I wonder what Wake would have done if Lee S. were to have worn a rain coat in the courtroom?)
 
If Doug has no part in it, why did they file the DJ in court?

And they trust you with people's lives?

Simply amazing.
 
Have you missed the multiple "crew news" in PHX where Doug repeatedly said they don't care what seniority method is used? Many of the West pilots have been screaming at Doug to take a leadership role but he keeps promising that the company has no part in it and is impartial about the whole situation. If the company is so involved, why are pilots resorting to wearing raincoats indoors? (Hmm.. I wonder what Wake would have done if Lee S. were to have worn a rain coat in the courtroom?)
Hey Jackass, who are the parties to the transition agreement which mandates the use of the Nic?
 
The 9th did not rule on the merits of the case, they ruled it wasnt ripe yet. Big difference.

Guess you missed that day in law school?

Answer the question with facts.


Yeah, I know you graduated from Columbia. Don't you remember I dropped out in the first semester? :rolleyes:

Did the 9th call it an internal union dispute or not? P.S. That would be a fact.

Running to the company (even wearing a raincoat in doors or having an emotional meltdown on video) is all entertaining but the 9th and the SCOTUS have already answered what the way forward to DFR II is. The internal union dispute won't be completed until ratification.

Those who can read can see that the two parties must bargain (the company and USAPA). Doug's lawyers have no confusion about it and he told the West repeatedly in the last crew news that the West has an internal dispute with their union, not the company.

Internal Union Dispute now. After ratification, DFR II merits judged on SCOTUS threshold as referred to by the 9th. Nothing to see here. Move along.
 
The 9th did not rule on the merits of the case, they ruled it wasnt ripe yet. Big difference.

Guess you missed that day in law school?

Answer the question with facts.
You left out the big part where they said the Nicolau might not be the final product. So the only ones that don't get the binding part, are you and the west die hards. Doug gets it real good. He is just playing it as long as he can.
 
If Doug has no part in it, why did they file the DJ in court?

And they trust you with people's lives?

Simply amazing.
Amazing. Because he can play both sides even longer. He also knows that meltdown chick will come in with the golf clubs if he doesn't blame it on a higher power.
 
You left out the big part where they said the Nicolau might not be the final product. So the only ones that don't get the binding part, are you and the west die hards. Doug gets it real good. He is just playing it as long as he can.
Clown, why did they say that? because they were explaining why it wasn't ripe, there was no final product so the harm to the west in their opinion could not be measured. It doesn't have to be the Nic. if the west doesn't sue is what they said. Do you think the west won't sue?
 
Clown, why did they say that? because they were explaining why it wasn't ripe, there was no final product so the harm to the west in their opinion could not be measured. It doesn't have to be the Nic. if the west doesn't sue is what they said. Do you think the west won't sue?
"Do you think the west won't sue?" Of course you will sue. You always sue! You don't win, but you sue.
 
What happened to the clown references. Did the good Dr. finally get through to you? :D


They like to refer to the TA as if it is some binding document that excludes any bargaining between the company and the union, but of course the document itself says the exact opposite. Which of course brings us back to what the 9th said. The two parties must bargain, and Doug has no doubt about who the two parties are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top