BoeingBoy
Veteran
- Nov 9, 2003
- 16,512
- 5,865
- Banned
- #436
Please.....
Another legal opinion from a non-lawyer - there's plenty of that on both sides, including my opinions.
However, don't confuse "case" with "trial". Someone can have a valid case, but decide it's not worth the cost/aggravation of filing a suit and taking it to trial. Likewise, someone can have what they think is a valid case, but the judge or jury will decide whether it is actually valid or not. Dismissed for lack of ripeness means nothing more than what it says - the trial was held too early. It implies nothing about the merits once ripeness occurs. I notice that the 9th didn't say "The suit lacked ripeness so we couldn't rule on merit because there is none ", but they did say that they didn't rule on merit.
Jim