PI-
I do not believe anyone that doesn't believe the Nic is unfair is an "unethical land grabber". The Nic IS unfair. Every pilot East or West knew that this merger could never be fair to every pilot, top to bottom, on a combined seniority list.
That is why, after attempting to negotiate and mediate an acceptable list, both pilot groups AGREED to binding arbitration. Nicolau ruled, even offering an eleventh hour escape for both sides to yield a bit for a more palatable result.
To be clear, I never believed in Seham's plan to overturn the Nic by throwing ALPA off the island. I didn't vote for USAPA but I am a member, pay my dues and assessments on time, and have my vote when the time comes. And if a T/A is presented that includes DOH with USAPA crafted C&R's, I will vote NO. Because I don't think that is fair. And it certainly ,thus far, has had no input from the West pilots.
As far as my PS career, I could have held BAE146 Captain for several years prior to the merger, but chose to remain a F/O because I didn't want to commute to reserve (sound familiar?). I came East as the former PSA bases were pared down and finally closed.
You are correct in that I would like to close out my career with a shorter commute, but I believe circumstances will keep me a transcon commuter and LOA 93 pilot for the short duration remaining of my USAirways career.
I wish more of the East pilots were as thoughtful as you and Piedmont 1984 in considering alternatives to DOH. ALPA and USAPA leaders have painted the pilots of USAirways into a corner that apparently only the courts can extricate them from.
A young man such as yourself may actually see this to its final solution. Best of luck.
Highest Regards
N924PS
PS,
I was out of line for calling you out. I could have used a generic example. I apologize.
I cannot disagree with anything in your post, and like you I did not vote for USAPA, I didn't see it working, but I joined on day one as they are my legally elected union. You are right, in the end we have one vote.
Take care.