cleardirect
Veteran
- May 24, 2008
- 6,234
- 9,749
- Banned
- #241
You will forgive me if I don't take your word for it.Nope. You numbers are wrong.
I showed my work. How about proving me wrong instead.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
You will forgive me if I don't take your word for it.Nope. You numbers are wrong.
Can you say Conditions and Restrictions? In case you haven't noticed the company pays more for longevity, the longer it took to get the job the more it pays. Sorry you can't grasp that concept.USAPA hides behind the false "longevity is seniority" argument so an East Reserve F/O can steal the job of a West Captain.
The job you have is of higher value than the time it took you to get it, sorry you can't grasp that concept.
A new hire can be represented without being placed a head of a 17 year LOS pilot.So that would be a union that fails to represent the interests of ALL members? Hang onto them pennies son!
Can you say Conditions and Restrictions?
A new hire can be represented without being placed a head of a 17 year LOS pilot.
LOS is meaningless in a seniority integration.A new hire can be represented without being placed a head of a 17 year LOS pilot.
Because no other union in the world does itWhy is this such a tough concept to grasp?
We should have just let them shut down and bought Airtran instead! Hindsight
You will forgive me if I don't take your word for it.
I showed my work. How about proving me wrong instead.
An East pilot should be the first to realize that there are no guarantees in this industry. Your "absolute fact" assumes one set of circumstances and no other. Just like the 1989 hires were told with "absolute certainty" that they would be captains in a few years based on a certain assumption. One could just as easily say that it was an "absolute fact" that the East pilots would have been on the street hoping to start over at a new carrier without the merger. Or that it was an "absolute fact" that HP would have gotten widebodies and been flying trans-Pac without the merger. In short, you devise an argument then pick "facts" to support it. This industry has a way of making assumed "facts" wrong.
Jim
boeingplt mst be that 1 out of 10 then. Maybe you can explain it to him/her next time you see him/her. While you're at it, explain it to USAPA - they seem to like predicting 10-15 years down the road.
Nothing that's in the future is set in stone - West pilots may start dropping like flies or the retirement age may be changed to 70 and the attrition goes up in smoke. However, Nicolau heard the testimony and saw the evidence both sides presented and made a judgment that both sides had agreed to abide by. It's really that simple.
Jim
USAPA hides behind the false "longevity is seniority" argument so an East Reserve F/O can steal the job of a West Captain.
Then put Conditions and Restrictions around the NIC award and put it out for a contract vote.
USAPA won't do it because they know it would pass and C&R's don't fix anything.