Hey.. Chill Out
Veteran
- Dec 16, 2007
- 501
- 3
Who the hell is they...and what AGC thought the policy was ok?
This whole situation is because of past representation and if you can't see that than UR ignorant. Agreements were signed behind closed doors and notes were not allowed during negotiations. We have now what we didn't know then, but, we won't have this in the future if we have confidence in the New Direction.
It's always harder to undo the injustice but I for one have confidence...........It will come.......
The international AGC's.
700- They found the attendance policy to be okay since the company said they will look at every situation individually.
The rep I talked to didn't agree since he thought the point system was too tough.. For example, one minute late is .5 and not .25 or something. Plus there is no reward for good behavior.
I happen to agree with him on this.
Because they were so hesitant to do anything at the time, nobody who is fired will get a chance to come back and work for the company because they were so agreeable with the new policy.
You guys can attack me, but we all know that you would be outraged if there was a target on your hub and the company was outright firing people, instead of doing the right thing and giving voluntary layoffs. Don't let your high seniority cloud your judgment of what's really happening.
Oh, and 700, don't worry. I'm getting a very solid education, but it involves something a bit deeper than being a bag thrower for the rest of my life, and a messageboard Ph.D. This job is CLEARLY leading people nowhere.